Re: [Freeipa-users] Sudo privilege inheritance in FreeIPA (3.0.x branch)

2016-02-05 Thread Jakub Hrozek
On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 11:39:07AM -0700, sysadmin ofdoom wrote: > Note: sudo rule "testSudo" fails when using user group. But succeeds > when using a directly defined user. > sudo rule "sudo-1" fails when user defined directly, but hosts are > defined with host group. > > The

Re: [Freeipa-users] Sudo privilege inheritance in FreeIPA (3.0.x branch)

2016-02-02 Thread Jakub Hrozek
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 09:36:13AM -0700, sysadmin ofdoom wrote: > I am trying to implement FreeIPA in a larger environment. Due to the > complexity of the environment I've been constructing a user group structure > such that i have groups at the following levels: > > project --> project_at_site

Re: [Freeipa-users] Sudo privilege inheritance in FreeIPA (3.0.x branch)

2016-02-01 Thread sysadmin ofdoom
Sorry for not defining the question. The question for this is: Are sudo rules supposed to be inherited in the same manner as HBAC rules? >From the case above, all my HBAC rules are working fine with indirect membership, but sudo only works with direct membership. I also saw the Tech preview SSSD

[Freeipa-users] Sudo privilege inheritance in FreeIPA (3.0.x branch)

2016-02-01 Thread sysadmin ofdoom
I am trying to implement FreeIPA in a larger environment. Due to the complexity of the environment I've been constructing a user group structure such that i have groups at the following levels: project --> project_at_site --> project_site_vendor HBAC rules are defined at the lowest level (vendor