Re: [Freeipa-users] bind-dynamicdb TKEY update

2015-08-25 Thread Petr Spacek
On 29.7.2015 06:30, Jorgen Lundman wrote:
 
 Hola!
 
 So with todays advisory: https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-01272
 we finally get to test the procedure to patch and update here :)
 
 Are there any plans for the dynamic_db github to pull in the fix, or should
 I proceed with that step?

For the record, dynamic_db repo is kind of obsolete because the API is being
merged to upstream BIND (hopefully) and we are changing the API at the same 
time.

I.e. not merging fixes to dynamic_db repo should make you nervous :-)

See
https://fedorahosted.org/bind-dyndb-ldap/wiki/BIND9/Patches#Futuredevelopment
for further details.

-- 
Petr^2 Spacek

-- 
Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-users mailing list:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users
Go to http://freeipa.org for more info on the project


Re: [Freeipa-users] bind-dynamicdb TKEY update

2015-07-29 Thread Martin Kosek
Hello Jorgen,

Given you ask on this list, I assume you are asking if this CVE is fixed in
FreeIPA DNS feature which utilizes BIND.

The answer is - it depends :-) As the bug itself is in BIND, it depends if
the patch made it for given downstream platform. As for Fedora and/or RHEL, I
checked with the BIND maintainer and the fix is there, live.

You can check the tracking bug, which is now public:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247361

HTH,
Martin

On 07/29/2015 06:41 AM, Jorgen Lundman wrote:
 
 Took a look at the diff while I was waiting:
 
 diff -rub bind-9.9.7-P1/lib/dns/tkey.c bind-9.9.7-P2/lib/dns/tkey.c
 --- bind-9.9.7-P1/lib/dns/tkey.c2015-06-18 07:48:03.0 +0900
 +++ bind-9.9.7-P2/lib/dns/tkey.c2015-07-15 08:50:22.0 +0900
 @@ -650,6 +650,7 @@
  * Try the answer section, since that's where Win2000
  * puts it.
  */
 +   name = NULL;
 if (dns_message_findname(msg, DNS_SECTION_ANSWER, qname,
  dns_rdatatype_tkey, 0, name,
  tkeyset) != ISC_R_SUCCESS) {
 
 
 Sigh. All that work for one line. :)
 
 Lund
 
 Jorgen Lundman wrote:

 Hola!

 So with todays advisory: https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-01272
 we finally get to test the procedure to patch and update here :)

 Are there any plans for the dynamic_db github to pull in the fix, or should
 I proceed with that step?

 Sincerely,

 Lund

 

-- 
Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-users mailing list:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users
Go to http://freeipa.org for more info on the project


[Freeipa-users] bind-dynamicdb TKEY update

2015-07-28 Thread Jorgen Lundman

Hola!

So with todays advisory: https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-01272
we finally get to test the procedure to patch and update here :)

Are there any plans for the dynamic_db github to pull in the fix, or should
I proceed with that step?

Sincerely,

Lund

-- 
Jorgen Lundman   | lund...@lundman.net
Unix Administrator   | +81 (0)90-5578-8500  (work)
Shibuya-ku, Tokyo| +81 (0)80-2090-5800  (cell)
Japan| +81 (0)3 -3375-1767  (home)

-- 
Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-users mailing list:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users
Go to http://freeipa.org for more info on the project


Re: [Freeipa-users] bind-dynamicdb TKEY update

2015-07-28 Thread Jorgen Lundman

Took a look at the diff while I was waiting:

diff -rub bind-9.9.7-P1/lib/dns/tkey.c bind-9.9.7-P2/lib/dns/tkey.c
--- bind-9.9.7-P1/lib/dns/tkey.c2015-06-18 07:48:03.0 +0900
+++ bind-9.9.7-P2/lib/dns/tkey.c2015-07-15 08:50:22.0 +0900
@@ -650,6 +650,7 @@
 * Try the answer section, since that's where Win2000
 * puts it.
 */
+   name = NULL;
if (dns_message_findname(msg, DNS_SECTION_ANSWER, qname,
 dns_rdatatype_tkey, 0, name,
 tkeyset) != ISC_R_SUCCESS) {


Sigh. All that work for one line. :)

Lund

Jorgen Lundman wrote:
 
 Hola!
 
 So with todays advisory: https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-01272
 we finally get to test the procedure to patch and update here :)
 
 Are there any plans for the dynamic_db github to pull in the fix, or should
 I proceed with that step?
 
 Sincerely,
 
 Lund
 

-- 
Jorgen Lundman   | lund...@lundman.net
Unix Administrator   | +81 (0)90-5578-8500  (work)
Shibuya-ku, Tokyo| +81 (0)80-2090-5800  (cell)
Japan| +81 (0)3 -3375-1767  (home)

-- 
Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-users mailing list:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users
Go to http://freeipa.org for more info on the project