On Thu, 2013-02-14 at 08:30 -0700, Rich Megginson wrote:
> On 02/14/2013 06:54 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > On Thu, 2013-02-14 at 10:02 +0100, Dag Wieers wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Another interesting recommendation from security is that all granted
> >> access (that is exceptional, rather than permane
On Thu, 14 Feb 2013, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Thu, 14 Feb 2013, Dag Wieers wrote:
So I was wondering whether this is something that was already discussed as
a feature for IPA ?
Yes, something along these lines was discussed in past.
We have three tickets so far in deferred state:
https:
On 02/14/2013 06:54 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2013-02-14 at 10:02 +0100, Dag Wieers wrote:
Hi,
Another interesting recommendation from security is that all granted
access (that is exceptional, rather than permanent) should be limited in
time from the onset.
If this is not possible all gran
On Thu, 2013-02-14 at 10:02 +0100, Dag Wieers wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Another interesting recommendation from security is that all granted
> access (that is exceptional, rather than permanent) should be limited in
> time from the onset.
>
> If this is not possible all granted access needs to be docume
On Thu, 14 Feb 2013, Dag Wieers wrote:
Hi,
Another interesting recommendation from security is that all granted
access (that is exceptional, rather than permanent) should be limited
in time from the onset.
If this is not possible all granted access needs to be documented and
revised regular
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Dag Wieers wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Another interesting recommendation from security is that all granted access
> (that is exceptional, rather than permanent) should be limited in time from
> the onset.
>
> If this is not possible all granted access needs to be documented