Consistency sounds good.
How would the name change affect yum update?
Chris
From: Petr Spacek pspa...@redhat.com
To: freeipa-users@redhat.com
Date: 17.07.2015 10:49
Subject:[Freeipa-users] Rename or not to rename (packages only)?
freeipa-server - ipa-server?
Sent
On Fri, 17 Jul 2015, Petr Spacek wrote:
Hello users and developers,
I wonder what do you think about naming inconsistency in FreeIPA packages.
Packages in Fedora are prefixed with freeipa-* but in RHEL (and derivatives)
the packages are named as ipa-*. Given that command line interface is in
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 10:47:37AM +0200, Petr Spacek wrote:
This rename would remove the inconsistency which drives me crazy when I need
to script something universally for RHEL and Fedora.
Wouldn't rpm Provides solve this particular issue?
--
Jan Pazdziora
Senior Principal Software
On (17/07/15 11:15), Jan Pazdziora wrote:
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 10:47:37AM +0200, Petr Spacek wrote:
This rename would remove the inconsistency which drives me crazy when I need
to script something universally for RHEL and Fedora.
Wouldn't rpm Provides solve this particular issue?
I would
Regarding this, I think the upgrade from freeipa to ipa should be looked
into carefully, since I experienced problem o post-upgrade script not
being run upon upgrade from freeipa-*-4.0 to ipa-*-4.1
Nicola
Il 17/07/15 11:10, Christopher Lamb ha scritto:
Consistency sounds good.
How would the
Hi,
(writing this offline, so maybe my reply is moot...)
On Freitag, 17. Juli 2015, Petr Spacek wrote:
Are there any reasons not to rename freeipa-* *packages* to ipa-*?
yes: in Debian and Ubuntu the packages are named freeipa-* as well, so let me
phrase your question differently: are there
