On Feb 3, 2011, at 11:41 , Dmitri Pal wrote:
On 02/03/2011 10:51 AM, Peter Doherty wrote:
On Feb 3, 2011, at 10:35 , Stephen Gallagher wrote:
- From the earlier points of the discussion, schema migration is
planned
for upgrades from 2.0.0 to future versions. It's only something
that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/02/2011 05:15 PM, Ian Stokes-Rees wrote:
Or perhaps there is a very long road of beta versions
that will come out over the next several years before a final 2.0
release appears.
While I can't comment on the final release schedule for
While I can't comment on the final release
schedule for FreeIPA v2, I
would like to point you at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/FreeIPAv2
What you should take away from this is that FreeIPA v2 is expected
to be
feature-complete by
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/03/2011 10:29 AM, Ian Stokes-Rees wrote:
While I can't comment on the final release schedule for FreeIPA v2, I
would like to point you at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/FreeIPAv2
What you should take away from this is that FreeIPA
On 02/03/2011 10:51 AM, Peter Doherty wrote:
On Feb 3, 2011, at 10:35 , Stephen Gallagher wrote:
- From the earlier points of the discussion, schema migration is planned
for upgrades from 2.0.0 to future versions. It's only something that was
left out of the alpha/beta process because
On 02/02/2011 09:28 AM, Peter Doherty wrote:
On Feb 2, 2011, at 09:09 , Simo Sorce wrote:
On Tue, 1 Feb 2011 22:30:50 -0500
Peter Doherty dohe...@hkl.hms.harvard.edu wrote:
On Feb 1, 2011, at 15:04 , Dmitri Pal wrote:
Also it is worth mentioning that we are planning to come up with
Beta 2
So you can't upgrade from 1.2 to 1.9 and you can't go from 1.9 to 2.0
and you can't go from 2.0 beta-1 to 2.0 beta-2?
So why would I want to use a product like that?
Upgrades will be possible within stable releases.
Handling upgrades in development versions would cost too much
development
On 02/02/2011 12:30 PM, Ian Stokes-Rees wrote:
So you can't upgrade from 1.2 to 1.9 and you can't go from 1.9 to 2.0
and you can't go from 2.0 beta-1 to 2.0 beta-2?
So why would I want to use a product like that?
Upgrades will be possible within stable releases.
Handling upgrades in
Can this wait till next week? If not it would be a real pity. We are
working hard to deliver the project to research groups like yours and
we will do our best to help you to migrate your data forward.
We will probably decide what path to take tomorrow. I'm not sure if
we're prepared to wait,
On 02/02/2011 04:02 PM, Ian Stokes-Rees wrote:
Can this wait till next week? If not it would be a real pity. We are
working hard to deliver the project to research groups like yours and
we will do our best to help you to migrate your data forward.
We will probably decide what path to take
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 10:02 PM, Ian Stokes-Rees
ijsto...@hkl.hms.harvard.edu wrote:
How did you expect anyone to seriously try to use FreeIPA if they
couldn't migrate between versions? Surely installation and extended use
(weeks/months) by non-developers is part of any beta-testing plan.
If
Thank you Natxo. We are working hard to get it there and when we do ..
it will awesome!
Jenny
Natxo Asenjo wrote:
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 10:02 PM, Ian Stokes-Rees
ijsto...@hkl.hms.harvard.edu wrote:
How did you expect anyone to seriously try to use FreeIPA if they
couldn't migrate
... as a sysadmin, whenever I read 'alpha|beta', all alarms go off
:-). I do follow the project, but I would never run any kind of
production on it just yet.
Our whole group thinks FreeIPA looks really exciting. We really do
*want* to use it. We want the project to succeed, and we'd be happy
On 02/01/2011 02:30 PM, Peter Doherty wrote:
I hope someone can help with this.
I've got a freeipa server running the 1.9 alpha release.
It's broken, (the x509 cert expired and can't be renewed) and I want
to just abandon it.
I set up a new host and installed the 2.0 beta release (from the
On Feb 1, 2011, at 14:43 , Dmitri Pal wrote:
On 02/01/2011 02:30 PM, Peter Doherty wrote:
I hope someone can help with this.
I've got a freeipa server running the 1.9 alpha release.
It's broken, (the x509 cert expired and can't be renewed) and I want
to just abandon it.
I set up a new host
On 02/01/2011 02:51 PM, Peter Doherty wrote:
On Feb 1, 2011, at 14:43 , Dmitri Pal wrote:
On 02/01/2011 02:30 PM, Peter Doherty wrote:
I hope someone can help with this.
I've got a freeipa server running the 1.9 alpha release.
It's broken, (the x509 cert expired and can't be renewed) and I
On Feb 1, 2011, at 14:43 , Dmitri Pal wrote:
On 02/01/2011 02:30 PM, Peter Doherty wrote:
I hope someone can help with this.
I've got a freeipa server running the 1.9 alpha release.
It's broken, (the x509 cert expired and can't be renewed) and I want
to just abandon it.
I set up a new host
On 02/01/2011 12:51 PM, Peter Doherty wrote:
On Feb 1, 2011, at 14:43 , Dmitri Pal wrote:
On 02/01/2011 02:30 PM, Peter Doherty wrote:
I hope someone can help with this.
I've got a freeipa server running the 1.9 alpha release.
It's broken, (the x509 cert expired and can't be renewed) and I
On 02/01/2011 03:00 PM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
On 02/01/2011 02:51 PM, Peter Doherty wrote:
On Feb 1, 2011, at 14:43 , Dmitri Pal wrote:
On 02/01/2011 02:30 PM, Peter Doherty wrote:
I hope someone can help with this.
I've got a freeipa server running the 1.9 alpha release.
It's broken, (the x509
On Feb 1, 2011, at 15:04 , Dmitri Pal wrote:
Also it is worth mentioning that we are planning to come up with Beta 2
later this week so may be it makes sense to wait couple days and move to
the latest bits.
Can I upgrade from Beta-1 to Beta-2, or are they incompatible?
Peter
20 matches
Mail list logo
