Re: [Freeipa-users] non-authoritative tricks for DNS resolution

2016-07-19 Thread Petr Spacek
On 18.7.2016 23:06, Brendan Kearney wrote: > On 07/18/2016 06:12 AM, Petr Spacek wrote: >> On 18.7.2016 03:25, Sullivan, Daniel [AAA] wrote: >>> Would a DNS view (bind) work? >>> >>> http://docstore.mik.ua/orelly/networking_2ndEd/dns/ch10_06.htm >>> >>> Also, depending on what you are using for

Re: [Freeipa-users] non-authoritative tricks for DNS resolution

2016-07-18 Thread Brendan Kearney
On 07/18/2016 06:12 AM, Petr Spacek wrote: On 18.7.2016 03:25, Sullivan, Daniel [AAA] wrote: Would a DNS view (bind) work? http://docstore.mik.ua/orelly/networking_2ndEd/dns/ch10_06.htm Also, depending on what you are using for NAT, some devices will mangle the reply payload of A record

Re: [Freeipa-users] non-authoritative tricks for DNS resolution

2016-07-18 Thread Petr Spacek
On 18.7.2016 03:25, Sullivan, Daniel [AAA] wrote: > Would a DNS view (bind) work? > > http://docstore.mik.ua/orelly/networking_2ndEd/dns/ch10_06.htm > > Also, depending on what you are using for NAT, some devices will mangle the > reply payload of A record lookups as they traverse NAT to avoid

Re: [Freeipa-users] non-authoritative tricks for DNS resolution

2016-07-17 Thread Sullivan, Daniel [AAA]
Would a DNS view (bind) work? http://docstore.mik.ua/orelly/networking_2ndEd/dns/ch10_06.htm Also, depending on what you are using for NAT, some devices will mangle the reply payload of A record lookups as they traverse NAT to avoid haripinning (a packet going out and then back in the same