Al Chu ch...@llnl.gov writes:
Hey Dave,
It's entirely possible there is another issue for your systems I never
encountered before or a bug in the workaround code. If you could send
the --debug output, that'd be great.
OK, appended.
Ipmitool also elects to hide
workarounds in its tools
As far as I can tell, the Sun workarounds are generic in ELOM and ILOM,
and haven't been fixed in the current versions. I have x4100 with ILOM
1.0 and 2.0, x2200M2 with ELOM 2.0, and x4200m2 and x4500 with ILOM 2.0.
All seem to need the workarounds, and have the latest firmware apart
from ILOM
Hey Dave,
OK, appended.
Hmmm. It seems the workaround just isn't working. It's possible I have
introduced a bug into the workaround. Let me see if I can figure it
out.
I didn't mean to be critical, of course. However, I find it's a real
practical problem with our heterogeneous HPC
Hi Kenneth,
Thanks for the --debug output (was about to e-mail you for it). 0xCE ==
Command response could not be provided.. That's certainly an odd
completion code error (compared to completion codes for record not
present or parameter out of range). I'm not sure why the HP machine
would be
Hey Dave,
Thanks for some of the clarifications. I'd like to keep the ordering
the same b/c it's actually split up IPMI 1.5 vs. IPMI 2.0. And some of
the text was from folks at Sun. So I've done the below patch instead.
Look good?
Al
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 15:02 +0100, Dave Love wrote:
As
Hey Dave,
Whew, I'm glad I have a relatively new sun board, this would have been
tough to figure out :-)
Effectively, the opensesspriv workaround is also needed for the Sun
boards. I've wrapped that workaround in as an automatic one for the Sun
workaround, so it should work now. Test tar.gz is
Hey Kenneth,
I've got a test tar.gz here that tries to workaround/ignore sensors with
the 0xCE completion code. Could you see if this works?
http://ftp.zresearch.com/pub/freeipmi/qa-release/freeipmi-0.7.10.beta2.tar.gz
Thanks,
Al
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 12:55 -0700, Al Chu wrote:
Hi Kenneth,
