Re: [Freeipmi-devel] KCS Driver SMS_ATN Register

2010-02-18 Thread Anand Babu Periasamy
Matt Jerdonek wrote: Hello, The KCS driver appears to not use the SMS_ATN register. This register is useful for BMC-to-BMC communication to know when the remote BMC has responded. Are there any plans to monitor this register in future releases? If not, are the maintainers open to

Re: [Freeipmi-devel] KCS Driver SMS_ATN Register

2010-02-18 Thread Al Chu
Hi Matt, Definitely open to patches. Looking over the IPMI spec, I agree w/ A.B., it seems to be more useful for a higher level monitoring, w/ the Get Message Flags and similar commands. I can think of several patch ideas: 1) add a KCS driver flag for checking for SMS_ATN in addition to OBF

Re: [Freeipmi-devel] KCS Driver SMS_ATN Register

2010-02-18 Thread Matt Jerdonek
Al Anand, Thanks for the quick response. I'm planning on using libfreeipmi to create a custom application that, among other things, will have to read event flags from the local event log and query sensors on local and remote BMCs. I looked at the spec, and I think I have a slightly different

Re: [Freeipmi-devel] KCS Driver SMS_ATN Register

2010-02-18 Thread Al Chu
Hi Matt, Anand wrote the KCS driver, so he'll respond too. Re-reading the spec again and reading your comments, I think I understand your situation. You're looking to read the SMS_ATN register so that you'll know whether a receive queue, event buffer, or whatever other thing has occurred, then