Re: [Freeipmi-devel] ipmi-sensors crash

2013-12-20 Thread Dave Love
Albert Chu ch...@llnl.gov writes: On Thu, 2013-12-19 at 11:56 +, Dave Love wrote: I realized that the system that caused the crash has 601 sensors; really. Patch attached. Well how about that :-) I should have apologized for not looking properly to start with, as the stack had been

Re: [Freeipmi-devel] ipmi-sensors crash

2013-12-19 Thread Dave Love
, but the other three Ambients are the same.) 2013-12-19 Dave Love f...@gnu.org * ipmi-sensors/ipmi-sensors.c (_calculate_record_ids): Check record numbr against array length. * common/toolcommon/tool-sensor-common.h (MAX_SENSOR_RECORD_IDS): Increase to 1024. --- freeipmi-1.3.4/common/toolcommon/tool

Re: [Freeipmi-devel] ipmi-sensors crash

2013-12-19 Thread Dave Love
Liebig, Holger holger.lie...@ts.fujitsu.com writes: I realized that the system that caused the crash has 601 sensors; really. Patch attached. [Liebig, Holger] Out of curiosity: since the sensor number is limited to 8 bit are these 601 SDR grouped with satellite controllers or different

[Freeipmi-devel] can't build srpm

2011-10-11 Thread Dave Love
On a current Red Hat 5 system I get a checksum mismatch: $ wget http://download.gluster.com/pub/freeipmi/1.0.7/freeipmi-1.0.7-1.src.rpm --2011-10-11 14:22:18-- http://download.gluster.com/pub/freeipmi/1.0.7/freeipmi-1.0.7-1.src.rpm Resolving download.gluster.com... 70.38.57.57

[Freeipmi-devel] bmc-device.8 typo

2011-09-22 Thread Dave Love
I assume this is what's intended: 2011-09-22 Dave Love f...@gnu.org * bmc-device/bmc-device.8.pre.in: Fix typos. Index: bmc-device/bmc-device.8.pre.in === --- bmc-device/bmc-device.8.pre.in (revision 7872) +++ bmc

[Freeipmi-devel] Re: Another FreeIPMI beta w/ BMC watchdog workaround for Sun machines

2010-06-29 Thread Dave Love
Albert Chu ch...@llnl.gov writes: Hey Dave, Frank, As discussed in the previous thread, there was a corner case in the bmc-watchdog workaround I previously did. I then discovered another corner case w/ the workaround. There is a new beta here. That seems to run OK on my x4500 under

[Freeipmi-devel] Re: FreeIPMI beta w/ BMC watchdog workaround for Sun machines

2010-06-28 Thread Dave Love
I thought I'd replied to this before... Albert Chu ch...@llnl.gov writes: Just want to clarify, you're saying this sleep(5) makes it work on the 4100? Yes, to the limited extent I tested it, as I'm not interested in running it on x4100. However, it seemed to be running on the x4500

[Freeipmi-devel] Re: FreeIPMI beta w/ BMC watchdog workaround for Sun machines

2010-06-22 Thread Dave Love
[Sorry, I thought I sent this earlier, but I'm harassed and losing track.] Al Chu ch...@llnl.gov writes: --- bmc-watchdog.c 16 Jun 2010 17:52:38 - 1.131 +++ bmc-watchdog.c 17 Jun 2010 23:18:57 - @@ -1920,6 +1920,8 @@ _daemon_cmd (void) reset_period

[Freeipmi-devel] Re: FreeIPMI beta w/ BMC watchdog workaround for Sun machines

2010-06-22 Thread Dave Love
Al Chu ch...@llnl.gov writes: says ps, where I need the -D on x4100 or x4200m2 to avoid bmc-watchdog: Get Watchdog Timer Error: BMC Busy Yeah, I'm certainly unsure of that one. Have you tried running w/o the IPMI kernel driver? I'm wondering if they don't together for you (don't

[Freeipmi-devel] Re: FreeIPMI beta w/ BMC watchdog workaround for Sun machines

2010-06-17 Thread Dave Love
Frank Steiner fsteiner-ma...@bio.ifi.lmu.de writes: Seems to work fine on my X4100 M2 machines :-) Starts up, reports status correctly, resets etc. Does it actually run indefinitely, though? I just realize I gave incomplete info, as I see it work for a few cycles. Here's a sample of the

Re: [Freeipmi-devel] fix for installation failure on Solaris

2010-05-05 Thread Dave Love
Al Chu ch...@llnl.gov writes: Hey Dave, Actually, the patch broke things on Linux. Sorry, I don't know what I was thinking that the two things were equivalent. I'm obviously displaying a lack of sleep. After looking around, a suggestion on line was made to only create the link on install

[Freeipmi-devel] bmc-watchdog.8 minor fix

2010-05-05 Thread Dave Love
There's some runaway emboldening. --- bmc-watchdog.8 2010/05/05 14:20:49 1.1 +++ bmc-watchdog.8 2010/05/05 14:21:07 @@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ .TP \fB\-t\fR, \fB\-\-start\fR Start BMC Watchdog Timer. Does nothing if the timer is currently -running. Identical to \fB\-\-reset command when

[Freeipmi-devel] fix for installation failure on Solaris

2010-04-30 Thread Dave Love
Solaris 10's cp doesn't have -d. This is against 0.8.4 source. 2010-04-30 Dave Love f...@gnu.org * ipmi-pef-config/src/Makefile.am (install-exec-hook): Don't use `cp -d'. --- Makefile.am 2010/04/30 14:40:39 1.1 +++ Makefile.am 2010/04/30 14:41:04 @@ -78,4 +78,4 @@ install-exec-hook

Re: [Freeipmi-devel] sun20 workaround doesn't

2009-06-18 Thread Dave Love
Johnson, Bill billjohn...@tditx.com writes: I would be interested in any thoughts or comments back. Like you're rudely abusing a GNU mailing list by advertising proprietary software? I have conman (and others). ___ Freeipmi-devel mailing list

Re: [Freeipmi-devel] tweaked Sun workaround text

2009-06-11 Thread Dave Love
Al Chu ch...@llnl.gov writes: A. Ok ... then in that case I should put: Sun Fire 2200/4150/4450 with ELOM I didn't understand that it was an ELOM thing. I can't actually demonstrate that on the other systems, but I think it must be the case; I assume ELOM has the same lan bugs on any

Re: [Freeipmi-devel] sun20 workaround doesn't

2009-06-11 Thread Dave Love
Al Chu ch...@llnl.gov writes: Actually, it seems the sun20 workarounds are working correctly. You are able to authenticate. The problem is ... Yes. I was only meaning to say that the SOL seems to be broken. # ipmiconsole -h ipmi101 -Wsun20 [error received]: SOL unavailable This

Re: [Freeipmi-devel] tweaked Sun workaround text

2009-06-10 Thread Dave Love
Al Chu ch...@llnl.gov writes: Hey Dave, Thanks for some of the clarifications. I'd like to keep the ordering the same b/c it's actually split up IPMI 1.5 vs. IPMI 2.0. Ah, that wasn't immediately obvious. And some of the text was from folks at Sun. So I've done the below patch instead.

Re: [Freeipmi-devel] sun20 workaround doesn't

2009-06-10 Thread Dave Love
Al Chu ch...@llnl.gov writes: Hey Dave, Whew, I'm glad I have a relatively new sun board, this would have been tough to figure out :-) Good. I could have offered to let you on here. Effectively, the opensesspriv workaround is also needed for the Sun boards. I've wrapped that workaround

Re: [Freeipmi-devel] sun20 workaround doesn't

2009-06-10 Thread Dave Love
Al Chu ch...@llnl.gov writes: Hehe. It's funny you mention this. I had a request/comment on this topic just last week. First, please take a look at my original post on this for what I was thinking of supporting: http://www.mail-archive.com/freeipmi-devel@gnu.org/msg00710.html For what

Re: [Freeipmi-devel] sun20 workaround doesn't

2009-06-09 Thread Dave Love
Al Chu ch...@llnl.gov writes: Hey Dave, It's entirely possible there is another issue for your systems I never encountered before or a bug in the workaround code. If you could send the --debug output, that'd be great. OK, appended. Ipmitool also elects to hide workarounds in its tools

[Freeipmi-devel] tweaked Sun workaround text

2009-06-09 Thread Dave Love
newer kit with it on. 2009-06-09 Dave Love f...@gnu.org * common/man/manpage-common-workaround-text.man: Tweak the Sun stuff. *** manpage-common-workaround-text.man 08 Apr 2009 21:47:05 +0100 1.6 --- manpage-common-workaround-text.man 09 Jun 2009 14:40:00 +0100 *** *** 41,54

[Freeipmi-devel] sun20 workaround doesn't

2009-06-08 Thread Dave Love
I tried `bmc-info -D LAN_2_0 -W sun20' on x4100s with both ILOM 1.0 and 2.0.2.5 (the latest as of a few months ago). It gives `password invalid' in both cases. (With LAN, -W endianseq works with both the 1.0 and 2.0 ILOMs, but it doesn't help with LAN_2_0.) Is --debug output the right thing to