[Freeipmi-devel] gcrypt

2005-11-03 Thread Albert Chu
AB, Bala, Argh! So libgcrypt doesn't implement md2. According to the docs: GCRY_MD_MD2 This is an reserved identifier for MD-2; there is no implementation yet. After thinking about it for a minute or two on the best way deal with this, I've decided to keep the current code for IPMI 1.5.

Re: [Freeipmi-devel] gcrypt

2005-11-03 Thread Anand Babu
,[ Albert Chu [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] | AB, Bala, | | Argh! So libgcrypt doesn't implement md2. According to the docs: | | GCRY_MD_MD2 This is an reserved identifier for MD-2; there is no | implementation yet. | | After thinking about it for a minute or two on the best way deal | with this, I've

Re: [Freeipmi-devel] ipmi 2.0 branch

2005-11-03 Thread Albert Chu
I am thinking if you should start IPMI-2.0 work in the current branch itself. We can always say 2.0 support as experimental. Otherwise you will still have to go thru the pain of merging at some point. I think I'll keep it in a branch. I guess it's development philosophy differences. I'm not

Re: [Freeipmi-devel] ipmi_lan_open_session() question

2005-11-03 Thread Anand Babu
,[ Albert Chu [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] | AB, I'm not doubting that it has a number of enhancements. However, | with all APIs, as you abstract away details you remove flexibility from | the programmer. For example, the strength of ipmipower is its protocol | parallelism. Its protocol parallelism