Re: [Freeipmi-devel] ipmi_lan_open_session() question

2005-11-04 Thread Albert Chu
-devel] ipmi_lan_open_session() question ,[ Albert Chu [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] | AB, I'm not doubting that it has a number of enhancements. However, | with all APIs, as you abstract away details you remove flexibility from | the programmer. For example, the strength of ipmipower is its

Re: [Freeipmi-devel] ipmi_lan_open_session() question

2005-11-03 Thread Anand Babu
,[ Albert Chu [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] | AB, I'm not doubting that it has a number of enhancements. However, | with all APIs, as you abstract away details you remove flexibility from | the programmer. For example, the strength of ipmipower is its protocol | parallelism. Its protocol parallelism

Re: [Freeipmi-devel] ipmi_lan_open_session() question

2005-09-29 Thread ab
,[ Albert Chu [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] | AB, | | libfreeipmi driver APIs will completely change in the next | release. | | I just want to be sure that a reasonable backwards compatibility | can be expected in 0.2.0. We all have code that isn't part of | FreeIPMI and some of the newer APIs may

Re: [Freeipmi-devel] ipmi_lan_open_session() question

2005-09-27 Thread Albert Chu
Subject: Re: [Freeipmi-devel] ipmi_lan_open_session() question On 16:07 Tue 27 Sep , Albert Chu wrote: Hi Jim, I think the open_lan_session() function was created a long time ago as a convenience function for libfreeipmi users. I know that the ipmiutil author