Al Chu writes:
> A. Ok ... then in that case I should put:
>
> "Sun Fire 2200/4150/4450 with ELOM"
>
> I didn't understand that it was an ELOM thing.
I can't actually demonstrate that on the other systems, but I think it
must be the case; I assume ELOM has the same lan bugs on any system th
Hey Dave,
On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 15:06 +0100, Dave Love wrote:
> Al Chu writes:
>
> > Hey Dave,
> >
> > Thanks for some of the clarifications. I'd like to keep the ordering
> > the same b/c it's actually split up IPMI 1.5 vs. IPMI 2.0.
>
> Ah, that wasn't immediately obvious.
>
> > And some of
Al Chu writes:
> Hey Dave,
>
> Thanks for some of the clarifications. I'd like to keep the ordering
> the same b/c it's actually split up IPMI 1.5 vs. IPMI 2.0.
Ah, that wasn't immediately obvious.
> And some of the text was from folks at Sun. So I've done the below
> patch instead. Look goo
Hey Dave,
Thanks for some of the clarifications. I'd like to keep the ordering
the same b/c it's actually split up IPMI 1.5 vs. IPMI 2.0. And some of
the text was from folks at Sun. So I've done the below patch instead.
Look good?
Al
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 15:02 +0100, Dave Love wrote:
> As fa
As far as I can tell, the Sun workarounds are generic in ELOM and ILOM,
and haven't been fixed in the current versions. I have x4100 with ILOM
1.0 and 2.0, x2200M2 with ELOM 2.0, and x4200m2 and x4500 with ILOM 2.0.
All seem to need the workarounds, and have the latest firmware apart
from ILOM 1.0
