Hey David,
On Mon, 2009-01-05 at 19:56 +0100, david maxera - Sun Microsystems -
Prague Czech Republic wrote:
Hi Al,
Usually it should be obvious. For example, running ipmi-sensors should
get you sensor readings and such. Looking at the freeipmi(7) manpage,
it might be worthwhile to put a short section on what is IPMI and some
sanity check introduction in there. I'll put that on my TODO.
# ipmi-sensors --debug
getpwuid_r: Error 0
It looks like HAVE_FUNC_GETPWUID_R_5 is not defined, apparently
getpwuid_r() has only 4 parameters at Solaris. And
_get_home_directory(...) in tool-sdr-cache-common.c requires it. Ok, the
problem is clear here, I'll figure something.
Hmmm. I already handled this for compiling on normal solaris.
#if defined(HAVE_FUNC_GETPWUID_R_5)
if (getpwuid_r (user_id,
pwd,
tbuf,
tbuf_len,
(pwdptr)) != 0)
{
PSTDOUT_PERROR(pstate, getpwuid_r);
return -1;
}
if (!pwdptr)
{
/* User not found - can't figure out cache directory */
PSTDOUT_PERROR(pstate, getpwuid_r);
return -1;
}
#elif defined(HAVE_FUNC_GETPWUID_R_4)
if (getpwuid_r (user_id,
pwd,
tbuf,
tbuf_len) != 0)
{
PSTDOUT_PERROR(pstate, getpwuid_r);
return -1;
}
#endif /* !defined(HAVE_FUNC_GETPWUID_R_4) */
I suppose it's possible the autoconf isn't detecting things properly for
opensolaris? Are the right macros being defined/not-defined in
config/config.h??
Nothing else seems to be working, or at least I haven't guessed the
correct combination of parameters. Say,
ipmipower -h latte2-sp -u my_sp_user -p my_sp_password --debug -s
latte2-sp: =
latte2-sp: IPMI 1.5 Get Channel Authentication Capabilities Request
latte2-sp: =
latte2-sp: RMCP Header:
latte2-sp:
latte2-sp: [ 6h] = version[ 8b]
latte2-sp: [ 0h] = reserved[ 8b]
latte2-sp: [ FFh] = sequence_number[ 8b]
latte2-sp: [ 7h] = message_class.class[ 5b]
latte2-sp: [ 0h] = message_class.reserved[ 2b]
latte2-sp: [ 0h] = message_class.ack[ 1b]
latte2-sp: IPMI Session Header:
latte2-sp:
latte2-sp: [ 0h] = authentication_type[ 8b]
latte2-sp: [ 0h] = session_sequence_number[32b]
latte2-sp: [ 0h] = session_id[32b]
latte2-sp: [ 9h] = ipmi_msg_len[ 8b]
latte2-sp: IPMI Message Header:
latte2-sp:
latte2-sp: [ 20h] = rs_addr[ 8b]
latte2-sp: [ 0h] = rs_lun[ 2b]
latte2-sp: [ 6h] = net_fn[ 6b]
latte2-sp: [ C8h] = checksum1[ 8b]
latte2-sp: [ 81h] = rq_addr[ 8b]
latte2-sp: [ 0h] = rq_lun[ 2b]
latte2-sp: [ 12h] = rq_seq[ 6b]
latte2-sp: IPMI Command Data:
latte2-sp: --
latte2-sp: [ 38h] = cmd[ 8b]
latte2-sp: [ Eh] = channel_number[ 4b]
latte2-sp: [ 0h] = reserved1[ 4b]
latte2-sp: [ 3h] = maximum_privilege_level[ 4b]
latte2-sp: [ 0h] = reserved2[ 4b]
latte2-sp: IPMI Trailer:
latte2-sp: --
latte2-sp: [ EEh] = checksum2[ 8b]
Truss reveals that sendto(...) syscall fails with Err#124 EAFNOSUPPORT -
as if some network protocol wasn't supported or what. But in ipmiping,
sendto() passes OK. What could it be?
This on the other hand is unexpected. I'm not really sure why you would
get a EAFNOSUPPORT error. I suppose its possible there's some subtlety
with opensolaris in the code that I'm not handling properly? If you
could send me the --debug output and the truss output that'd be great.
Could you also try other tools (bmc-info, ipmi-sensors) out of band and
let me know if the results are the same?
Out of band bmc-info returns bmc-info: invalid hostname.
Well, I now see that the problem isn't in my wrong understanding of
FreeIPMI, but rather in the Solaris naming functions. This is basically
the information I needed ;-)
If you feel you got a handle on it now, great :-) I'd love to get
things working on opensolaris. I'll be glad to add any patches you have
into the mainline tree.
Al
Thanks.
David
--
Albert Chu
ch...@llnl.gov
Computer Scientist
High Performance Systems Division
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
___
Freeipmi-devel mailing list
Freeipmi-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freeipmi-devel
