Hi Al,
> I just noticed in ipmi_lan_open_session you changed:
>
> u_int8_t *auth_code_data, u_int32_t auth_code_data_len
>
> to
>
> char *password
>
I think, I haven't touched non-UDM functions. All UDM functions are like
function_name2 and they are completely written from scratch.
I will look
7:12 pm
Subject: Re: [Freeipmi-devel] ipmi_lan_open_session() question
> ,[ Albert Chu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ]
> | AB, I'm not doubting that it has a number of enhancements. However,
> | with all APIs, as you abstract away details you remove
> flexibility from
> | the progr
,[ Albert Chu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ]
| AB, I'm not doubting that it has a number of enhancements. However,
| with all APIs, as you abstract away details you remove flexibility from
| the programmer. For example, the strength of ipmipower is its protocol
| parallelism. Its protocol parallelism
hat currently
exists.
Al
--
Albert Chu
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Anand Babu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thursday, September 29, 2005 6:31 pm
Subject: Re: [Freeipmi-devel] ipmi_lan_open_session() question
&g
,[ Albert Chu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ]
| AB,
| >
| > libfreeipmi driver APIs will completely change in the next
| > release.
| >
| I just want to be sure that a "reasonable" backwards compatibility
| can be expected in 0.2.0. We all have code that isn't part of
| FreeIPMI and some of the newer AP
From: Anand Babu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tuesday, September 27, 2005 6:59 pm
Subject: Re: [Freeipmi-devel] ipmi_lan_open_session() question
> ,[ "James Laros" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ]
> | I have a question about the usage of ipmi_lan_open_session. First
> | off I
When you say the APIs will completely change does that mean
that the current ones will dissapear? If so I guess I should
wait until the next release? When will that be?
Can I assist by using early release stuff?
Jim
On 18:59 Tue 27 Sep , Anand Babu wrote:
> ,[ "James Laros" <[EMAIL PROTECT
,[ "James Laros" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ]
| I have a question about the usage of ipmi_lan_open_session. First
| off I don't see it used in any of the utilities that come with the
| distro? Any reason?
`
libfreeipmi driver APIs will completely change in the next
release. Thats one reason "fish
t Chu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tuesday, September 27, 2005 5:06 pm
Subject: Re: [Freeipmi-devel] ipmi_lan_open_session() question
> Jim,
>
> I forgot to ask. What motherboard are you attempting to work with?
> I've fixed a number of session startup corner cases in
it in
ipmipower.
Al
--
Albert Chu
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
- Original Message -
From: James Laros <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tuesday, September 27, 2005 4:34 pm
Subject: Re: [Freeipmi-devel] ipmi_lan_open_session() question
>
> On 16:19 T
rmore National Laboratory
>
> - Original Message -
> From: James Laros <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tuesday, September 27, 2005 4:12 pm
> Subject: Re: [Freeipmi-devel] ipmi_lan_open_session() question
>
> > On 16:07 Tue 27 Sep , Albert Chu wrote:
> &g
ptember 27, 2005 4:12 pm
Subject: Re: [Freeipmi-devel] ipmi_lan_open_session() question
> On 16:07 Tue 27 Sep , Albert Chu wrote:
> > Hi Jim,
> >
> > I think the open_lan_session() function was created a long time
> ago as a
> > convenience function for l
On 16:07 Tue 27 Sep , Albert Chu wrote:
> Hi Jim,
>
> I think the open_lan_session() function was created a long time ago as a
> convenience function for libfreeipmi users. I know that the ipmiutil
> author (ipmiutil.sourceforge.net) atleast uses it. I suppose it has
> never been used for th
Hi Jim,
I think the open_lan_session() function was created a long time ago as a
convenience function for libfreeipmi users. I know that the ipmiutil
author (ipmiutil.sourceforge.net) atleast uses it. I suppose it has
never been used for the FreeIPMI tools because:
A) some tools like bmc-config
14 matches
Mail list logo
