Hi Tiago,
I think the best option is to specify to ipmimonitoring the specific
sensors you don't want reported (-R). This is easy if you're scripting
something. If you're not, defaults can be configured
into /etc/freeipmi/freeipmi.conf so you don't have to type it every time
(note that the config would be through ipmi-sensors not ipmimonitoring.
ipmimonitoring is a script around ipmi-sensors).
A slightly more advanced option is to try and disable this sensor via
ipmi-sensors-config. Advanced sensor configuration can be tricky and
motherboards don't always like it/work well with it b/c vendors
typically assume the user will never try to change their defaults. This
latter option isn't one I recommend for more inexperienced folks.
Al
On Wed, 2012-10-10 at 17:16 +0100, Tiago Vasconcelos wrote:
Hi
I have installed freeipmi 1.2.1 on a Dell PowerEdge R415, where
ipmimonitoring outputs the following Critical state:
48 | Processor 2 Presence | Entity Presence | Critical | 'Entity Absent'
The system is meant to have a single processor. So I don't want ipmi to
complain about the absence of a second processor.
I have browsed the iDRAC interface but I couldn't find out how I can get
rid of this Critical alert. Does anyone know?
Tiago
___
Freeipmi-users mailing list
Freeipmi-users@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freeipmi-users
--
Albert Chu
ch...@llnl.gov
Computer Scientist
High Performance Systems Division
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
___
Freeipmi-users mailing list
Freeipmi-users@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freeipmi-users
