other. With clusters, it seems that if *one* node,
namely the gateway, is removed from the network, a large number of nodes now have lost
access, and are in effect removed from the public network.
eric
___
Freenet-dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ht
d like the plague. Remember that the
> government has tanks and bombers while you do not.
>
>
I'm feeling some bad energy from the people on this list. I think they knew what they
were getting into, and would have rather died than put up with persecution any longer.
I think
onger than the HTL. I know this is
unlikely to be a problem in large networks, but it seems to me to be a problem.
eric
On Sun, Dec 24, 2000 at 08:40:07PM -0800, Mr.Bad wrote:
> >>>>> "E" == Eric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> I don'
On Sun, Dec 24, 2000 at 06:32:18PM -0800, Mr.Bad wrote:
> >>>>> "E" == Eric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> E> One problem I see is that having a trust list might cluster
> E> nodes too much. It would become a popularity conte
On Sat, Dec 23, 2000 at 08:47:39PM -0800, Mr.Bad wrote:
> So, I've been thinking about the MediaEnforcer thing. I know that
> people seem to believe that it's not justified since the node may not
> have had the document available before the request, but frankly I
> think that's too fine a point fo
