Re: NAS-Post in Netgear Accounting-Packet

2008-08-19 Thread Stefan Puch
In the Start-Packets and Interim-Update-Packets it seems to be right. But ALL the Stop-Packets have 0 as NAS-Port. So, you agree that this is a bug of the Access-Point? Thank you for your reply. Wolfgang Burger Hello, I've got three WG102 Access Points from Netgear. I'm using the latest

Re: NAS-Post in Netgear Accounting-Packet

2008-08-19 Thread Ivan Kalik
Tue Aug 19 18:11:30 2008 : Auth: Login OK: [test2 /via Auth-Type = EAP] (from client AP-Halle1 port 1 cli 001302BE) Tue Aug 19 18:12:30 2008 : Error: rlm_radutmp: Logout for NAS AP-Halle1 port 0, but no Login record .. It's shows that the user is still connected... Does anyone know how this

NAS-Post in Netgear Accounting-Packet

2008-07-01 Thread Wolfgang Burger
Hi list, please have a look at this Accounting-Request. It was sent by a netgear WG102 WLAN-Access-Point: rad_recv: Accounting-Request packet from host 192.168.1.133 port 1033, id=48, length=194 Service-Type = Framed-User Acct-Status-Type = Stop User-Name = burgerw

Re: NAS-Post in Netgear Accounting-Packet

2008-07-01 Thread Ivan Kalik
Is the Access-Point sending the wrong NAS-Port? If so, I would contact Netgear. I just want to confirm what`s the problem. Have a look at more accounting packets. It's quite likely that AP is sending port 0 for all of them. Ivan Kalik Kalik Informatika ISP - List

Re: NAS-Post in Netgear Accounting-Packet

2008-07-01 Thread Wolfgang Burger
Am 01.07.2008 um 11:42 schrieb Ivan Kalik: Is the Access-Point sending the wrong NAS-Port? Have a look at more accounting packets. It's quite likely that AP is sending port 0 for all of them. Ivan Kalik Kalik Informatika ISP In the Start-Packets and Interim-Update-Packets it seems to be