El 16/11/11 16:54, xgiova escribió:
I'm havig the same problem on my Centos server.
Can you explain how did you solve?
The problem was related with virtual servers. The virtual server
assigned to the client running radzap was incorrect.
--
Angel L. Mateo Martínez
Sección de Telemática
Área
Il 23/11/2011 10.18, Angel L. Mateo ha scritto:
El 16/11/11 16:54, xgiova escribió:
I'm havig the same problem on my Centos server.
Can you explain how did you solve?
The problem was related with virtual servers. The virtual server
assigned to the client running radzap was incorrect.
I'm havig the same problem on my Centos server.
Can you explain how did you solve?
Thanks in advance.
Giovanni
--
View this message in context:
http://freeradius.1045715.n5.nabble.com/radzap-Nothing-to-send-tp4822106p4998155.html
Sent from the FreeRadius - User mailing list archive at
I'm havig the same problem on my Centos server.
Can you explain how did you solve?
Thanks in advance.
Giovanni
--
View this message in context:
http://freeradius.1045715.n5.nabble.com/radzap-Nothing-to-send-tp4822106p4998169.html
Sent from the FreeRadius - User mailing list archive at
Hello,
I have solved my problem. The problem was really related with virtual
servers.
--
Angel L. Mateo Martínez
Sección de Telemática
Área de Tecnologías de la Información _o)
y las Comunicaciones Aplicadas (ATICA) / \\
http://www.um.es/atica_(___V
Tfo:
Radius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I get all this below and have tried several commands but it keeps returning
me to this
with no real reason why it didn't work.
You didn't say what you typed in as the command-line for radzap.
Try reading the man pages for radzap radwho.
Alan DeKok.
-
, it was about 47 lines
long
and had about the same information in it that the help of radzap.
- Original Message -
From: Alan DeKok [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: FreeRadius users mailing list freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 12:30 PM
Subject: Re: RadZap
Radius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would type
radzap -N 63.215.26.177 S406 secret
Which is wrong. Please READ the help the man page.
It keeps telling me it can't locate that IP address.
Yes, you're using the command incorrectly. S406 is NOT the IP
address of the RADIUS server.
Alan
Message -
From: Alan DeKok [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: FreeRadius users mailing list freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 1:06 PM
Subject: Re: RadZap
Radius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would type
radzap -N 63.215.26.177 S406 secret
Which is wrong. Please
Radius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don't think I'm that stupid about an IP address. That was the port.
So... where did you type in the IP address of the RADIUS server?
The answer is nowhere, which is your mistake.
I guess I'l have to google for someones example.
Uh... right.
Alan
PM
Subject: Re: RadZap
Radius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don't think I'm that stupid about an IP address. That was the port.
So... where did you type in the IP address of the RADIUS server?
The answer is nowhere, which is your mistake.
I guess I'l have to google for someones example.
Uh
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: FreeRadius users mailing list freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 1:06 PM
Subject: Re: RadZap
Radius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would type
radzap -N 63.215.26.177 S406 secret
Which is wrong. Please READ the help the man page.
It keeps
, December 01, 2005 1:06 PM
Subject: Re: RadZap
Radius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would type
radzap -N 63.215.26.177 S406 secret
Which is wrong. Please READ the help the man page.
It keeps telling me it can't locate that IP address.
Yes, you're using the command incorrectly. S406
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Radius
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 1:44 PM
To: FreeRadius users mailing list
Subject: Re: RadZap
Your man says this.
radzap [-d raddb_directory] [-N nas_ip_address] [-P
nas_port] [-u
-
From: Scott O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'FreeRadius users mailing list'
freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 2:56 PM
Subject: RE: RadZap
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Radius
Sent: Thursday, December
S406 is an S and not a 5
-N is for the Nas IP (according to the man.)
- Original Message -
From: Scott O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'FreeRadius users mailing list'
freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 2:56 PM
Subject: RE: RadZap
-Original
, 2005 2:56 PM
Subject: RE: RadZap
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
Behalf Of Radius
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 1:44 PM
To: FreeRadius users mailing list
Subject: Re: RadZap
Your man says this.
radzap [-d
= 4.240.144.66
Acct-Session-Time = 766846
I'll give it a try.
Thanks
- Original Message -
From: Laker Netman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: FreeRadius users mailing list freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 4:00 PM
Subject: Re: RadZap
Yikes :)
Lookee here
OK, thank you. That worked.
- Original Message -
From: Laker Netman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: FreeRadius users mailing list freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 4:00 PM
Subject: Re: RadZap
Yikes :)
Lookee here...
radzap -N 63.215.26.177 -P S406 -u
I compiled the cvs update and still get
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# radiusd -v
radiusd: FreeRADIUS Version 1.0.4, for host , built on Aug 17 2005 at
23:01:39
Copyright (C) 2000-2003 The FreeRADIUS server project.
There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A
PARTICULAR
Sarkis Gabriel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After installing the CVS although not the latest one as of today but it was
suppose to
have the fix for the Negative port.
cvs update
Alan DeKok.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Dear Alan,
Thanks, you are right and now it's working.
--- Alan DeKok [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Soheb Ahmed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for your reply. I have used port collection
of FreeBSD on
line to install freeradius.
So? My statement is still true.
Alan DeKok.
-
List
Soheb Ahmed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am running FreeBSD5.4 and freeradius 1.0.4 is working fine with
radwho and radlast. Problem is when I issue radzap command to any
logged user, I get error like Starting reading configuration
file.port 1813 is used by another radius server. Please
Hi,
Thanks for your reply. I have used port collection of FreeBSD on line to install freeradius.Alan DeKok [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Soheb Ahmed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: I am running FreeBSD5.4 and freeradius 1.0.4 is working fine with radwho and radlast. Problem is when I issue radzap command to
Soheb Ahmed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for your reply. I have used port collection of FreeBSD on
line to install freeradius.
So? My statement is still true.
Alan DeKok.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Thank you
Sarky
-- Original Message ---
From: Sarkis Gabriel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org
Sent: Tue, 10 May 2005 00:12:20 +0200
Subject: Re: RadZap
Okie i got the CVS once more, i think the way i got it the first time was
wrong hence i got
Sarkis Gabriel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have installed freeradius from CVS and i found out that radzap in
that is a bin file and it is giving Segmentation Fault, I just want
a confirmation if there was any changes made on cvs?
That's fixed. Do a cvs update
Alan DeKok.
-
List
Sarkis Gabriel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have just checked out 1.0.2 and found out RadZap does not work i
even did what was said to copy the radzap.c from CVS to 1.0.2 and
compile it, but still no Joy with radzap and i do rely on that on a
daily bases.
You couldn't have copied radzap.c
@lists.freeradius.org
Sent: Mon, 09 May 2005 13:30:15 -0400
Subject: Re: RadZap
Sarkis Gabriel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have just checked out 1.0.2 and found out RadZap does not work i
even did what was said to copy the radzap.c from CVS to 1.0.2 and
compile it, but still no Joy with radzap
Sarkis Gabriel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry i meant radzap and radwho.c, i copied them both and did ./configure
--with-
experimental-modules and then make but i noticed it broke during the make
process and
that is what i got during the weekend.
shrug Try grabbing a copy of the
Sarkis Gabriel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
just to confirm is it this cvs command
cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/source checkout -j release_1_0 radiusd
No.
that is the one i got and i tried to compile it from scratch but it fails on
./configure
I hate playing twenty questions.
PROTECTED]
To: freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org
Sent: Mon, 09 May 2005 14:53:24 -0400
Subject: Re: RadZap
Sarkis Gabriel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
just to confirm is it this cvs command
cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/source checkout -j release_1_0 radiusd
No.
that is the one i got
Sarkis Gabriel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To be honest i have spent a lot of time working out cvs and i do not
know how to check for the version on cvs the only thing i found in
the archive about cvs and 1.0.3 is the one below posted few days
back and pointing out that it is the current
it is incompatibility.
Sorry once more to go on and on but i think the above gives a better view of
what i
have done .
Sarky
-- Original Message ---
From: Alan DeKok [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org
Sent: Mon, 09 May 2005 16:51:23 -0400
Subject: Re: RadZap
Sarkis Gabriel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The CVS command i used was the one advising someone else to use and
i got radiusd, copied the files and got a compile error when it got
to radwho.c
If you grab the 1.0.x candidate from CVS, you don't have to copy
over radwho.c. The previous messages
properly i will install and configure and play around with radzap.
Sorry for the confusion, and thanks for the help.
Sarky
-- Original Message ---
From: Alan DeKok [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org
Sent: Mon, 09 May 2005 17:19:13 -0400
Subject: Re: RadZap
mlgjd mlgjd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm triing to use radzap but it seems that i'm doing something wrong.
radzap doesn't work in 1.0.2. There will be a fix in 1.0.3, which I
guess we should release sometime soon...
Alan Dekok.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
On Monday 25 of April 2005 22:27, Alan DeKok wrote:
mlgjd mlgjd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm triing to use radzap but it seems that i'm doing something wrong.
radzap doesn't work in 1.0.2. There will be a fix in 1.0.3, which I
guess we should release sometime soon...
Alan Dekok.
-
Micko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have the same problem with 1.0.1. Is it possible that in version 1.0.1
radzap doesn't work too?
Yes.
Alan DeKok.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Radius wrote:
Maybe you need to (sometime a .)/usr/local/freeradius/bin/radzap
etc.
My not working below is not a command not files, but it show the result
after it run. But when I'm running radwho to see who is online still the
old result
Try radwho -r
to make sure your geting the full S port number.
radzap does not drop their connection, it only deletes stale
entries listed in radwho that are no longer connected
Chan Min Wai wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Radius wrote:
Maybe you need to (sometime a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Radius wrote:
Sure does. We use it from time to time, when our wholesale connections
don't send a good disconnect.
radzap IP-Address S:port [EMAIL PROTECTED]
... Hum ... Not working..
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# radwho
Login Name
Radius wrote:
Radzap is mainly for the stale radwho that are not there but still
showing loged in.
Yep that user is already logout due to a power cycle/reboot in the NAS.
So radzap is the right tools to get the zombie users off radius.
radwho first to see the one you want.
then do a
Maybe you need to (sometime a .)/usr/local/freeradius/bin/radzap
etc.
Chan Min Wai wrote:
Radius wrote:
Radzap is mainly for the stale radwho that are not there but still
showing loged in.
Yep that user is already logout due to a power cycle/reboot in the NAS.
So radzap is the
Sure does. We use it from time to time, when our wholesale connections
don't send a good disconnect.
radzap IP-Address S:port [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chan Min Wai wrote:
Hello all,
I found that this script isn't working for me, so wonder if this script
is still working?
What does this script check
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Because there's a bug in the source code which prevents
it from working when you're trying to run it on the same server
on which the server is running - no matter what OS that
box is using?
You mentioned on the same server. I also tried to radzap from a remote
server,
I don't know if this has anything to do with it but the UTMP
on FreeBSD is slightly different than many other platforms. I
came across these differences a number of years ago, when I was
having problems. The main consequence I came across was that
FreeBSD truncates the nas/port information.
Maybe you are correct. But when we use radwho -r, we can use the port number we
see. I copied the radutmp file to a linux/freeradius test server, and i can zap
the
user.
The problem is in the real server, the server that runs FreeBSD. It seems that
radzap does not find the radiusd server, but
Hello guys
I would like to know if there is some difference in the source code of
freeradiusd
0.9.1, or in compilation options, between linux and freeBSD, because when i run
radzap, compiled by the same code, in linux it works, in FreeBSD does not.
thanks very much, Luiz Gustavo
-
List
Oliver Zimmermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The only thing radzap needs from the configuration files is the
location of the radutmp file, and that can easily be specified on the
command line of radzap.
No, radzap from 0.7 had no directory-parameters:
Umm... I know that. It had the
Luiz Gustavo Anflor Pereira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to know if there is some difference in the source code
of freeradiusd 0.9.1, or in compilation options, between linux and
freeBSD, because when i run radzap, compiled by the same code, in
linux it works, in FreeBSD does not.
Oliver Zimmermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But now I have a problem. We added some new querie statements in the
radiusd.conf/sql.conf, which radzap (0.7) can't parse any longer, when
it reads these confs at start-up.
So it probably shouldn't be reading the configuration files.
The only
On Mon, 03 Jan 2005 16:01:50 -0500
Alan DeKok [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oliver Zimmermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But now I have a problem. We added some new querie statements in the
radiusd.conf/sql.conf, which radzap (0.7) can't parse any longer, when
it reads these confs at start-up.
Hello
I had this problem too. I found that in the newer versions of freeradius, the
read_mainconfig function (in the src/main/mainconfig.c) tests if the port of
radiusd is free. If it is not, then exits the program. The problem is that
radzap
uses the same function.
So, radiusd is running, you
On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 14:21:37 -0200 (BRST)
Luiz Gustavo Anflor Pereira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello
I had this problem too. I found that in the newer versions of freeradius, the
read_mainconfig function (in the src/main/mainconfig.c) tests if the port of
radiusd is free. If it is not,
Geoffrey Cauchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We are running Free Radius 1Pre3 and wanted to delete a user entry from
radutmp using radzap. The user entry is not being deleted though!
Other people have said the same thing.
Anyone knows about issues with radzap?
Not really.
i.e. Set up a
56 matches
Mail list logo
