Re: [Freerdp-devel] Why is there a change in the command line interface?

2012-12-01 Thread olav
Hi, I think it is ok to shorten the command-line options.It is a correct presupposition that the user should not have to care about the details of the program's working, as for example which shared objectfiles to load. The commandline options should be about which goals to reach, for example forwa

Re: [Freerdp-devel] Why is there a change in the command line interface?

2012-12-01 Thread Alex Bligh
On 1 Dec 2012, at 07:36, olav wrote: > I totally agree with Kevin Dalley on this point: > > fr., 30.11.2012 kl. 16.49 -0800, skrev Kevin Dalley: > >> I strongly recommend that any tool which runs on Linux follow these >> standards, >> rather than create a new command line interface. This inte

Re: [Freerdp-devel] Why is there a change in the command line interface?

2012-12-01 Thread Неворотин Вадим
I don't see any problems with enable/disable: --wallpaper=yes and --wallpaper=no Moreover, you can add very usefull group options for all +/- parameters: --enable=wallpaper,aero or --disable=wallpaper,aero And I can't understand where you've found problems with plugins. Enabling plugins: --plu

Re: [Freerdp-devel] Why is there a change in the command line interface?

2012-12-01 Thread Marc-André Moreau
Hi olav, You are right about commands like /a (that 'a' stands for 'addin' btw, I decided to with the more microsoft-like terminology). I do not intend to leave it that way. I'm thinking of adding channel specific options, they just aren't there yet. For instance, you can now enable clipboard this

Re: [Freerdp-devel] Why is there a change in the command line interface?

2012-12-01 Thread Christian Nilsson
Hi, Just chiping in that I like the old command line interface to stay, at least for a foreseeable future. The reason being loots of scripts that I don't want to (be forced to) change. So for atleast, say a year it should still be possible to use the old options. This change in command line inter

Re: [Freerdp-devel] Why is there a change in the command line interface?

2012-12-01 Thread Marc-André Moreau
I've designed a very generic command-line parser with that in mind. I've been told by some people on IRC that they were fine with just moving on to the new command-line interface, so I didn't bother doing the extra work for keeping backwards compatibility forever. However, it is definitely doable.

Re: [Freerdp-devel] Why is there a change in the command line interface?

2012-12-01 Thread Kevin Dalley
Keeping backwards compatibility sounds like a wonderful idea. If you are willing to do the work to support both, that sounds good. I suspect that it will take some work to make sure that everything works well. Part of my problem is that I will have to support old versions of xfreerdp, as well as