Hi All, I would like to recall my earlier email below. I am new to
freesurfer so any help is appreciated. Thanks!
-- Forwarded message --
From: Brainiac . brainia...@gmail.com
Date: Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 3:55 PM
Subject: WM Parcellation - lobe mapping
To:
Hi Mohan,
I'm afraid the smaller structures you mentioned aren't generated by
our automated segmentation tools. As for the Left-Hippocampus and
Right-Hippocampus labels, these are parts of the tail of the
hippocampus where the people doing the manual segmentations the
automated method was trained
I have generated surfaces using the the centos4 build (version 5.0)
and want to confirm that my surface-based GM and WM volumes are correct.
For the surface-based GM calculation I originally used 'mris_anatomical_stats
-l lh.cortex.label subjectID hemi'
(run from within the 'label' subdirectory)
Hi,
I have an update to this query. I tried using mkanalysis-sess instead
of the .new version, and now I do seem to be able to get rid of
intensity normalization and prewhitening (or at least, adding these
flags now has an effect on betas/t-stats, and in the expected
directions). The code I'm
Hi,
I have an update to this query. I tried using mkanalysis-sess instead
of the .new version, and now I do seem to be able to get rid of
intensity normalization and prewhitening (or at least, adding these
flags now has an effect on betas/t-stats, and in the expected
directions). The code I'm
Hi Alex,
sorry but you should never mix versions.
cheers
Bruce
On Mon, 5 Sep 2011, Alexander
Lebedev wrote:
Dear Freesurfer users and developers,
I apologize if this question sounds rhetorically or maybe it has been
asked previously (I didn't find the answers in the archives). But here
it
Thank you very much for your response!
May I also ask how about running CUDA and non-CUDA analyses for the same
dataset? I am asking because I don't have CUDA support on one of my
machines as well (It has ATI videocard). I have found a thread on that
topic
I wouldn't do that either. We have actively worked to minimize the
difference between CUDA and non-CUDA versions, but it's not possible to
make them identical due to differences in architecture
sorry again
Bruce
On Tue, 6 Sep 2011, Alexander Lebedev wrote:
Thank you very much for your
1. Yes, mri_vol2surf will do this if you have registered the surfaces to
the data (using bbregister for example).
2. Yes, this sounds correct although it's hard to say without all the
details
cheers
Bruce
On Mon, 5 Sep 2011, ZhiLiangLong wrote:
Hi FS experts:
I have two questions
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 1:25 PM, Alexander Lebedev awl...@rambler.ru wrote:
Thank you very much for your response!
May I also ask how about running CUDA and non-CUDA analyses for the same
dataset? I am asking because I don't have CUDA support on one of my
machines as well (It has ATI
Hi,
I have faced a problem using ROI-based, fcseed-config and fcseed-sess
I used either:
fcseed-config -roi
/cluster/tootell/pitcairn/1/shahin/good_subjects_anat/atou_anat/label/rh.V1.label
-fcname mean.R_V1.dat -fsd bold -mean -cfg mean.R_V1.config
OR:
fcseed-config -roi
Hello,
I am having a problem with mri_robust_template using too much RAM and
causing my computers to freeze. I am using fs510. I think I would like to
try to convert the inputs to uchar as Martin suggested, but I am not sure
exactly where to do this. Would I issue this command:
For each
12 matches
Mail list logo
