Dear freesufers,
I quick question about smoothing of data in cortical thickness analysis. I
have a comparison that is rather borderline significant. When using
smoothing of 10 mm I get a limited region in the frontal lobe that is
differs between groups. Changing to 15 mm I get larger regions -
Hi Eric
the optimal smoothing kernel more or less matches the size of the effect,
so it's impossible to say a priori. A bigger kernel is better if there is
more widespread subtle thinning
cheers
Bruce
On Mon, 27 Jul 2015, Erik Lindberg
wrote:
Dear freesufers,
I quick question about
I can't recommend anything in that case, since I am just relying on available,
but very scanty documentation.
I think people were using norm.mgz, but the question how these results
corespond to other volumes has not been addressed yet.
Some normative, semi-technical paper on QA measures in
it depends on which gm you are looking at. For cortex you can use the
brain.mgz, for any subcortical structure you can use the norm
cheers
Bruce
On Mon, 27 Jul
2015, Jacek Manko wrote:
I can't recommend anything in that case, since I am just relying on available,
but very scanty
hmmm, that usually means you ran out of memory, which is surprising given
that that step doesn't take very much. Were there other jobs running on
the same machine?
On Mon, 27 Jul 2015, Park, Jung Mi wrote:
Hello Freesurfer expert
I got an error message while running recon-all.
1) subject
Hello Freesurfer expert
I got an error message while running recon-all.
1) subject name gencess
SUBJECTS_DIR: /space/sake/3/users/inverse/subjects
PWD: /autofs/cluster/catanagp/users/jumi/subjects/anat/AD0401AG/anat/scripts
setenv SUBJECTS_DIR /space/sake/3/users/inverse/subjects
cd
How did you do the FC analysis? In the volume or on the surface?
doug
On 07/23/2015 11:00 AM, Meiling Li wrote:
Hello Freesurfer Experts
I am emailing to ask aome questions about cluster_wise correction on
surf. I hope some experts here could help me...
The seed_based functional connectivity
I think you'll need to contact the FSL list to ask how to convert the
COPE volume to a voxel-wise percent signal change. Once you have that,
then you can just project that data onto the surface instead of the
original COPE.
doug
On 07/24/2015 05:11 PM, Mariam Sood wrote:
Dear Doug,
Thank
Can you send the full command line and full terminal output?
doug
On 07/25/2015 02:43 PM, Park, Jung Mi wrote:
Hi Freesurfer team
I did unpacksdcmdir successfully before at Martinos center.
Recently I got error message while I was trying to unpacksdcmdir.
; Cannot open
thanks i was not using the -open x , correctly
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 7:37 PM, Z K zkauf...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
Yes. That is correct.
On Jul 24, 2015, at 7:06 PM, joseph veliz josephveli...@gmail.com wrote:
so I should run one subject per 4 cores
by using -openmp 4 for each of the
In tkmedit on fsaverage? I just ran something similar (using your
/lh.amyg.faceaw.5.3CRFH.anatconstr.p05.n65.label) and it seemed to give
the correct results. I viewed it with
tkmedit -f
/usr/pubsw/packages/fsl/current/data/standard/MNI152_T1_2mm.nii.gz -aux
dougvolume.nii.gz -ov
I don't think there is a way to know. for perfect data, the false
positive control should be appropriate across all smoothing levels. As
you smooth more and more, you can start getting low frequency junk, but
this often creeps into the estimation of the FWHM and hurts you more
than helps you.
The the CAG is a nuisance variable and you are interested in testing for
the differnces in thickness with CAG regressed out, then you should do a
two step procedure. First run with DODS and test for differences between
groups in CAG. This is the contrast you will need:
0 0 0 1 -1 0
0 0 0 1 0
I have also come across this output.
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 6:57 AM, Bruce Fischl fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
wrote:
Hi Antonin
not sure - if you upload the subject I'll take a look
Bruce
On Fri, 24 Jul 2015,
Antonin Skoch wrote:
Dear experts,
I came several times across the
What are the two T1 images? The command line below will take a label in
152 space and transfer it to mni305 space. I'm not sure what you are
actually trying to achieve.
doug
On 07/23/2015 10:44 AM, amirhossein manzouri wrote:
Hi,
I found group differences based on T1 images with 8 channel
Sorry, I'm having a problem understanding your question. Can you elaborate?
doug
On 07/27/2015 04:32 AM, marco.m...@tin.it wrote:
Hi, I'm Marco from Italy,
I've problem with qdec because qdec produces these files in the
stats_table directory. How you can see there aren't all those
Hi list,
preproc-sess -s Sess101 -fwhm 5 -surface fsaverage lhrh -mni305 -fsd rest
-per-runproduces fmc file but fmcstc and fmcstcsm are lacking.A- The slice
timing correction is performed with the command reported above? Or I should add
to command line -stc (furthemore, where I should put it?
See preproc-sess -help
On 07/27/2015 02:30 PM, std...@virgilio.it wrote:
Hi list,
preproc-sess -s Sess101 -fwhm 5 -surface fsaverage lhrh -mni305 -fsd
rest -per-run
produces fmc file but fmcstc and fmcstcsm are lacking.
A- The slice timing correction is performed with the command reported
Hi Doug,
Yes, one set of subjects by two editors and no difference in thickness but
huge difference on the area between two sets. Actually I want to see f
there is any difference between editors for the same set of subjects.
On Monday, July 27, 2015, Douglas N Greve gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Hello Freesurfer expert
Running recon-all abruptly stopped with this error message at NMR center;
mri_ca_register -invert-and-save transforms/talairach.m3z
Loading, Inverting, Saving, Exiting ...
Reading transforms/talairach.m3z
ERROR: cannot find or read transforms/talairach.m3z
ERROR:
there is probably an error before that. Can you send the entire
recon-all.log?
On Mon, 27 Jul 2015, Park, Jung Mi wrote:
Hello Freesurfer expert
Running recon-all abruptly stopped with this error message at NMR center;
mri_ca_register -invert-and-save transforms/talairach.m3z
Loading,
Dear all,
I loaded the t.nii under a contrast directory in freeview, and then loaded the
t.nii to matlab using MRIread. When I checked the t value for a point, such as
32, 38, 32, the value is 3.96. Then I got value from the same point (32, 38,
32) in matlab, I got a different t value. I
Hello Freesurfer Experts,
For a longitudinal dataset we worked on some time ago, in version 5.1, we
want to add subjects with only one time point. According to the
instructions here:
https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/LongitudinalProcessing
we can do this by passing only a single time
Hi,
I’m running FS6 and everything seems to be running fine except that a txt file
filled with this error message is created:
rm: No match.
tkregister2_cmdl: Command not found.
tkregister2_cmdl: Command not found.
tkregister2_cmdl: Command not found.
tkregister2_cmdl: Command not found.
(I just wanted to follow-up on this request. If it is not possible to do these
things, that would also be helpful to know so that I don’t continue to attempt
different variations of the options. If any more information is required to
make the questions clearer, please let me know what you need
Hi, I'm Marco from Italy,
I've problem with qdec because qdec produces these files in the stats_table
directory. How you can see there aren't all those 'lh.aparc.a2009s' type.Can
you help me?Thanks!
26 matches
Mail list logo