Re: [Freesurfer] Building atlas by Xhemi: Segmentation fault (core dumped)

2021-04-19 Thread Li-Zhen Chen
External Email - Use Caution Not sure what is going wrong here. Try running mri_annotation2label --subject myatlas.i3 --hemi lh --outdir /media/chenlz/Zixuans1/MRI_Data/Human_MRI/CCS_PrePro/myatlas.i3/make_cortex_label.tmp.8214 --annotation aparc.a2009s Does it segfault in the

Re: [Freesurfer] question about lesion segmentation using samseg

2021-04-19 Thread Iglesias Gonzalez, Juan E.
Yes, it is possible, but the inferior contrasts of these sequences compared to FLAIR will likely yield noisier results. Juan Eugenio Iglesias Senior research fellow CMIC (UCL), MGH (HMS) and CSAIL (MIT) http://www.jeiglesias.com From: on behalf of Ritobrato Datta Reply-To: Freesurfer

[Freesurfer] question about lesion segmentation using samseg

2021-04-19 Thread Ritobrato Datta
External Email - Use Caution Hi All, I have T1w MPRAGE, T2w and PD images but I dont have FLAIR images from a Multiple Sclerosis study. Can I use samseg to segment the lesions ? Can you please suggest ? Many thanks Ri ___ Freesurfer

Re: [Freesurfer] problem running last step longitudinal analysis

2021-04-19 Thread Zeng, Qi
External Email - Use Caution Hi Douglas, I found the aseg.presurf.mgz for all cross sessions and base using version 6.0. Best, Qi On Sun, Apr 18, 2021 at 10:43 PM Douglas N. Greve wrote: > Check each of your cross time points to make sure that all have an > aseg.presurf.mgz.

Re: [Freesurfer] Tracula group analysis in freesurfer

2021-04-19 Thread Yendiki, Anastasia
Hi Qi - This is documented here: https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/FsTutorial/TraculaStatistics Anastasia. From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu on behalf of Zeng, Qi Sent: Monday, April 19, 2021 1:40 PM To: Freesurfer support list Subject:

[Freesurfer] Tracula group analysis in freesurfer

2021-04-19 Thread Zeng, Qi
External Email - Use Caution Hi Experts, I understand there is surface-based group analysis in Freesurfer, which is for thickness, curvature, volume and etc. Is there a group analysis for DTI tracula results? Any links to recommend to conduct the analysis? Thank you so much!

Re: [Freesurfer] recon_all subcortical volume adjuested eTIV

2021-04-19 Thread Jaime Gomez
External Email - Use Caution Thank you Douglas for the answer. Could you be more explicit? So, once you have the aseg.stats you need to run which command with --etiv-only? On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 4:00 PM Douglas N. Greve wrote: > It is not done. If you are running

Re: [Freesurfer] Native volume to fs_average surface

2021-04-19 Thread Fischl, Bruce
Hi Mason Pretty much all surfaces of a single subject/hemi have the same topology (number of vertices/faces/etc...), so if you map to any of them you map to all of them. As for the syntax for doing this in one step I defer to Doug. Doing it in 2 steps I would use the white or pial surface to

Re: [Freesurfer] Native volume to fs_average surface

2021-04-19 Thread Mason Wells
External Email - Use Caution Hi Bruce, No problem. I tried to run vol2surf using the following command, but it doesn't run. * mri_vol2surf --mov filtered_func_data.nii.gz --hemi rh --reg /home/masontwells/Documents/freesurfer/subjects/sub-0006/surf/rh.sphere.reg

Re: [Freesurfer] Native volume to fs_average surface

2021-04-19 Thread Fischl, Bruce
Hi Mason I should have read to the end of my inbox before replying - Doug is the expert in this so I would definitely follow his advise over mine. In general the native->average surface transform is stored in the ?h.sphere.reg files Cheers Bruce From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu

Re: [Freesurfer] Abormally high foldind index

2021-04-19 Thread Fischl, Bruce
Hi Ellen The folding index is pretty sensitive to kmax, which can be huge for tiny antennae and such. It may not be the right measure for what you are trying to capture. You can always compute the curvatures with mris_curvature then overlay them and see if there are outlier values, or find the

Re: [Freesurfer] Autorecon1 failure

2021-04-19 Thread Abdollahi, Shervin (NIH/NINDS) [C]
External Email - Use Caution What is your advice for me now? Should I abandon the approach or is there anyway to dig deeper into it and solve the error? From: "Douglas N. Greve" Reply-To: Freesurfer support list Date: Sunday, April 18, 2021 at 10:21 PM To:

Re: [Freesurfer] Native volume to fs_average surface

2021-04-19 Thread Mason Wells
External Email - Use Caution Hi Bruce, Thanks for the reply. Would you agree this is the optimal way to move from native vol to fs_average? I am confident with moving to native surface. My current pipeline for this is as follows. Anything here stick out that you think I should

Re: [Freesurfer] Native volume to fs_average surface

2021-04-19 Thread Fischl, Bruce
Hi Mason Yes, you can use mri_vol2surf to go native vol->native surf, then mri_surf2surf to go native surf->group surf Cheers Bruce From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu On Behalf Of Mason Wells Sent: Monday, April 19, 2021 5:45 AM To: Freesurfer support list ;

Re: [Freesurfer] Native volume to fs_average surface

2021-04-19 Thread Mason Wells
External Email - Use Caution Hi Doug, I have the data both in its native functional space (e.g. filtered_func_data). I also run bbregister so have the transformation matrix to register it to the T1 (e.g. anat2exf.register.dat). Do you suggest running vol2surf on the

Re: [Freesurfer] Native volume to fs_average surface

2021-04-19 Thread Mason Wells
External Email - Use Caution I am using FreeSurfer formatted data, yes. I believe I am mapping to the individual surface correctly, but can I double check you agree? I am running bbregister to register the functional data to the T1 which appears to do a good job: *

[Freesurfer] FLAIR image analysis

2021-04-19 Thread Jindal, Saurabh
External Email - Use Caution Hi experts, Could we analyze FLAIR images using freesurfer without having T1 images? Saurabh The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected Healthcare Information or other information of a

Re: [Freesurfer] Autorecon1 failure

2021-04-19 Thread Douglas N. Greve
You should talk to them On 4/19/2021 7:52 AM, Abdollahi, Shervin (NIH/NINDS) [C] wrote: External Email - Use Caution What is your advice for me now? Should I abandon the approach or is there anyway to dig deeper into it and solve the error? *From: *"Douglas N. Greve" *Reply-To:

Re: [Freesurfer] recon_all subcortical volume adjuested eTIV

2021-04-19 Thread Douglas N. Greve
It is not done. If you are running asegstats2table, you can have it perform the correction by adding --etiv to the command line On 4/19/2021 7:41 AM, Jaime Gomez wrote: External Email - Use Caution Hi, Does the asegs.stats produced by recon_all have the volume estimates of

Re: [Freesurfer] Native volume to fs_average surface

2021-04-19 Thread Douglas N. Greve
If you have the data in the native functional space, then just mri_vol2surf --mov func.nii --hemi rh --reg reg.lta --trgsubject fsaverage --projfrac 0.5 --o rh.func.fsa.mgz On 4/19/2021 5:23 AM, Mason Wells wrote: External Email - Use Caution External Email - Use Caution

Re: [Freesurfer] Abormally high foldind index

2021-04-19 Thread Ellen Ji
External Email - Use Caution Hi Bruce, I looked at the pial surfaces and WM by running this for the outlier subjects: freeview -v subject1/mri/T1.mgz \ subject1/mri/brainmask.mgz \ -f subject1/surf/lh.white:edgecolor=yellow \ subject1/surf/lh.pial:edgecolor=red \

[Freesurfer] Longitudinal processing: QA

2021-04-19 Thread Malo Gaubert
External Email - Use Caution Hello FreeSurfer developers, I am trying to apply longitudinal processing on T1w MRI data for two timepoints (~8 months between the two TP) in adolescents in order to perform vertex-based analyses. I am following the online tutorial here for the

[Freesurfer] Freeview - manjaro

2021-04-19 Thread Vishnu S
External Email - Use Caution I'm getting a repeated error with libjpeg.so.62. is there any known fix? ___ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

[Freesurfer] recon_all subcortical volume adjuested eTIV

2021-04-19 Thread Jaime Gomez
External Email - Use Caution Hi, Does the asegs.stats produced by recon_all have the volume estimates of subcortical structures adjusted by the eTIV? I want to understand the effect of sex in the segmented structures. Should normalize the volumes of aseg.stats (Vol/eTIV) or is

Re: [Freesurfer] Native volume to fs_average surface

2021-04-19 Thread Glasser, Matthew
External Email - Use Caution What is most important is that you map to your individual’s surface (whether that is in subject’s physical space or MNI space doesn’t matter so much). If you are using FreeSurfer formatted data, others can suggest how to do this. With

Re: [Freesurfer] Native volume to fs_average surface

2021-04-19 Thread Mason Wells
External Email - Use Caution HI Matt, Thanks for the reply. Are you suggesting I go native volume > native surface > fs_average? If so, can you recommend the best can I go from native to group average surface? Mason T Wells, MSc PhD student School of Optometry and Vision

Re: [Freesurfer] Native volume to fs_average surface

2021-04-19 Thread Glasser, Matthew
External Email - Use Caution You would do that through the subject’s own surface. It does not work very well to map data directly from the volume onto group average surfaces (see e.g. Coalson et al., 2018 PNAS). Matt. From: on behalf of Mason Wells Reply-To: Freesurfer

[Freesurfer] Native volume to fs_average surface

2021-04-19 Thread Mason Wells
External Email - Use Caution Hi experts, I have some fMRI data that I have pre-processed in Feat. I want to resample a single subject's data to the fs_average surface but unsure of the most optimal way of doing this. At present I am warping the functional data to the MNI brain