Did anyone else happen to see this ridiculous story on Gizmodo today?
http://gizmodo.com/5919149/your-brain-scan-looks-different-on-mac-and-pc
It cites the recent article The Effects of FreeSurfer Version,
Workstation Type, and Macintosh Operating System Version on Anatomical
Volume and Cortical
not create the register.dat with bbregister, I would strongly
suggest it. It works really well on the partial volume files. If you do,
you should specify your current register.dat as the init registration.
doug
Andrew Dumas wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to move a bunch of partial FOV functional
Hi,
I'm trying to move a bunch of partial FOV functional images (occipital
cortex only with oblique coronal slices) into common space. For each
subject, I have a registration file (register.dat) to register
functional images to anatomicals, and I'd like to incorporate the
talairach.xfm
Hi everyone,
I'm using a frozen version of FS v4.0 and I have a subject with rather
large ventricles that don't get filled properly (surfaces and aseg are
off) during recon. I can't really find a good fix in previous messages
besides to upgrade FS, since it seems like the newer versions will
. This ruins the continuity of each individual label with little
islands of various values. Is there a mri_annot2annot or equivalent?
Thanks!
Andrew Dumas
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman
Thanks, Doug-- that's what I was looking for!
Andrew
On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 11:51 -0400, Douglas Greve wrote:
Try using mri_surf2surf with the --sval-annot flag.
doug
On 4/5/11 11:20 AM, Andrew Dumas wrote:
Hi FreeSurfer experts,
Is there a way to move annotations from the same
Hi,
I've been looking through the mailing list archives for anything on
calculating BPF (Brain Parenchymal Fraction) and have only found some
fuzzy descriptions of how to calculate this using FreeSurfer. I know I
can get ICV from the aseg.stats, but how can I obtain the volumes of
total white and
Hi!
I'm trying to partition a surface into a number of random but
roughly-equally sized areas, and I've been using the
mris_make_face_parcellation function to do this. Is it possible to
have a finer control over the sizes of each label it generates? I only
see 7 options in:
, Andrew Dumas wrote:
Hi!
I'm trying to partition a surface into a number of random but
roughly-equally sized areas, and I've been using the
mris_make_face_parcellation function to do this. Is it possible to
have a finer control over the sizes of each label it generates? I only
see 7