Re: [Freesurfer] bug in dwri-motion

2014-02-21 Thread Gerit Pfuhl
and a linux machine and got the same result. Sorry but I cannot replicate your error. a.y On Thu, 20 Feb 2014, Gerit Pfuhl wrote: tried adopted version of dmri_motion --dwi yourDWIs.nii.gz --mat your.ecclog --bval your.bvals --out output.txt as well as trac-all -qa -c dmrirc_file

Re: [Freesurfer] bug in dwri-motion

2014-02-21 Thread Gerit Pfuhl
that you specify anywhere, it's an output of trac-all. Do you have read permmission to that file? a.y On Fri, 21 Feb 2014, Gerit Pfuhl wrote: Hi, thanks, no doubt that the files are okay, it must be something in how tracula is set up I supose because this is the report we get: File exists

[Freesurfer] bug in dwri-motion

2014-02-20 Thread Gerit Pfuhl
could not open bvals] Kind regards Gerit Pfuhl ___ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed

Re: [Freesurfer] bug in dwri-motion

2014-02-20 Thread Gerit Pfuhl
in trac-all -prep with 5.3 occur when dmri_motion is run or at a different step? On Thu, 20 Feb 2014, Gerit Pfuhl wrote: Dear Tracula Experts, after careful checking we still cannot run trac-all -qa or dwri-motion as the command always returns: could not open bvals but the same file

Re: [Freesurfer] bug in dwri-motion

2014-02-20 Thread Gerit Pfuhl
...@nmr.mgh.harvard.eduwrote: Then it's no surprise that the error doesn't occur in 5.2, because 5.2 doesn't run dmri_motion at all. When you run dmri_motion on the command line, do you use the same syntax as the one you're showing below? On Thu, 20 Feb 2014, Gerit Pfuhl wrote: yes, it happens at trac-all -qa

[Freesurfer] trac-all -qa

2014-02-17 Thread Gerit Pfuhl
Dear Freesurfer experts, we are curious whether we can run trac-all -qa in 5.3. and use it as regressors with our results from tracula 5.2. I.e. is it advisable or shall we run the complete analysis? Thanks, Gerit Pfuhl ___ Freesurfer mailing list

Re: [Freesurfer] tracula -path option 0 unknown

2013-07-16 Thread Gerit Pfuhl
by any chance setting that to something other than the default number in your configuration file? a.y On Mon, 15 Jul 2013, Gerit Pfuhl wrote: Dear all, please find attached the trac-all.log file. Regards Gerit On 15 July 2013 18:14, Anastasia Yendiki ayend...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote

Re: [Freesurfer] motion dependent resolution: bbr vs flt

2013-07-16 Thread Gerit Pfuhl
the QC on the T1 data gives no obvious clue. We edit the brainmask when there are surface issues However, we have not quantified this data yet - a closer look may indeed tell us more. Thanks Gerit On 16 July 2013 20:52, Pfuhl, Gerit gerit.pf...@uniklinikum-dresden.dewrote:

[Freesurfer] tracula -path option 0 unknown

2013-07-05 Thread Gerit Pfuhl
Dear Freesurfer experts, for one subject (out of over 80 already processed) I get i nthe last step an error I am unable to locate. The output from the tracula -path command says at the end: option 0 unknown. There are no reported problems in -prep, and -bedp. The script uses default values (I run

Re: [Freesurfer] incomplete tracts

2013-04-05 Thread Gerit Pfuhl
are running bedpostx outside of trac-all (i.e. trac-prep then bedpostx then trac-path) might it be an issue that is solved with installing the 5.2. version? Would that run in freesurfer 5.1.0? I guess we need to change the dcmrirc files only a bit. Kind regards Gerit Pfuhl On 3 April 2013 16:59