part to the beginning and it should work
>
> cheers
> Bruce
> On Thu, 4 May 2017, Jared P Zimmerman wrote:
>
>> mris_sample_parc ${sub} \
>> lh ${targ}.nii.gz \
>> ${targ}_fs6_annot.annot \
>> -ct ${SUBJECTS_DIR}/${sub}/bla_test_table.txt
>>
t;
> sorry, I don't see the mris_sample_parc command line. Can you just send it
> and the entire screen output?
> On Thu, 4 May 2017, Jared P Zimmerman wrote:
>
>> That’s what I did below, see the script and log.txt attached to a previous
>> email. This is the output from t
fwiw, this problem persists in FS6.0
-jared
> On May 4, 2017, at 12:11 PM, Jared P Zimmerman <jar...@mail.med.upenn.edu>
> wrote:
>
> That’s what I did below, see the script and log.txt attached to a previous
> email. This is the output from the mris_sample_parc s
ments changed
>>>>> pass 2: 0 segments changed
>>>>> writing annotation to s111_bla_8mm_orig2_annot.annot…
Thanks,
Jared
> On May 4, 2017, at 11:36 AM, Bruce Fischl <fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:
>
> can you try it with -ct
>
>
Hey Bruce et al, any update on this?
Thanks,
Jared
> On Apr 28, 2017, at 2:48 PM, Jared P Zimmerman <jar...@mail.med.upenn.edu>
> wrote:
>
> Here’s the script that I’m running and the merged stderr stdout. I’ve also
> tried various permutations of mris_sample_p
.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:
>
> Hi Jared
>
> can you send us the full command line and screen output?
>
> cheers
> Bruce
> On Wed, 26 Apr 2017, Jared P Zimmerman wrote:
>
>> Any chance I could get some help on this? still having this problem
>
Any chance I could get some help on this? still having this problem
> On Apr 20, 2017, at 6:26 PM, Jared P Zimmerman <jar...@mail.med.upenn.edu>
> wrote:
>
> Hi FS Experts,
>
> I’m having trouble getting anatomical stats from a parcellation I made out of
> scanner
Hi FS Experts,
I’m having trouble getting anatomical stats from a parcellation I made out of
scanner-space volume ROIs. I have taken the following steps to do this.
mri_vol2vol --mov myROI.nii.gz --targ orig.mgz --regheader --o
myROI_orig.nii.gz --interp nearest
mris_sample_parc Subj111 lh
it used to
> work), it always went to fsaverage space. Do you want to decimate the
> native space surfaces?
>
>
> On 09/29/2016 10:15 AM, Jared P Zimmerman wrote:
>> I want to project to the native subject surfaces though, not
>> fsaverage. If I use —trgsubject subjI
not individual subjects.
>
> cheers
> Bruce
> On Thu, 29 Sep 2016, Jared P Zimmerman wrote:
>
>> I want to project to the native subject surfaces though, not fsaverage. If
>> I use —trgsubject subjID would that work with the —icoorder flag?
>> Alternatively I guess I
> On Sep 29, 2016, at 12:00 AM, Douglas Greve <gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:
>
> you can actually skip the ico thing and just use --trgsubject fsaverage6
>
> On 9/28/16 7:06 PM, Jared P Zimmerman wrote:
>> Thanks Doug,
>>
>> This does seem like it wi
11 matches
Mail list logo
