Re: [Freesurfer] Cortical Segmentation reliability in Mid-Line structures

2014-08-13 Thread amirhossein manzouri
Dear Bruce, I meant cingulate cortex, the cuneus and precuneus ! Best regards, Amirhossein Manzouri On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 12:53 PM, Bruce Fischl fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote: Hi Amirhossein which structures do you mean? Like the ventricles? We usually mask those regions out

Re: [Freesurfer] Cortical Segmentation reliability in Mid-Line structures

2014-08-13 Thread Bruce Fischl
oh, I see. Usually it's pretty good there. Sometimes if there is enough motion, or lower res scans it can be hard to distinguish left from right gray matter, but otherwise it is a pretty reliable set of regions I believe cheers Bruce On Wed, 13 Aug 2014, amirhossein manzouri wrote: Dear

[Freesurfer] Cortical Segmentation reliability in Mid-Line structures

2014-08-11 Thread amirhossein manzouri
Dear All, I wonder if you have experienced or there is any report on cortical segmentation reliability in the mid-line structures of the brain, so one should take them into consideration in running group differences with Qdec? Best regards, Amirhossein Manzouri

Re: [Freesurfer] Cortical Segmentation reliability in Mid-Line structures

2014-08-11 Thread Bruce Fischl
Hi Amirhossein which structures do you mean? Like the ventricles? We usually mask those regions out using the ?h.cortex.label. The surfaces should be frozen in those regions in any case, meaning that the white and pial are in the same location (and the thickness is 0) cheers Bruce On