Re: [Freesurfer] Edits to longitudinal pial surface and aseg

2015-04-27 Thread Martin Reuter
Hi, editing the long does not really introduce much bias I think. It is usually not necessary and it is not recommended, because often it problems in the long are caused by earlier problems in the base or even cross, so it is best to fix it there. Your case seems to be different (problems fir

Re: [Freesurfer] Edits to longitudinal pial surface and aseg

2015-04-22 Thread prasser
Repost.Thanks. On Mon, 20 Apr 2015 16:21:38 -0700 wrote Thank you for your reply. Yes, I'm finding that it is only small edits that are required in the Long for the case of pial surface errors. It is usually in areas where no editing was required in the cross and

Re: [Freesurfer] Edits to longitudinal pial surface and aseg

2015-04-20 Thread prasser
Thank you for your reply. Yes, I'm finding that it is only small edits that are required in the Long for the case of pial surface errors. It is usually in areas where no editing was required in the cross and base, but the pial surface in the Long extends to include dura or cerebellum. I was ho

Re: [Freesurfer] Edits to longitudinal pial surface and aseg

2015-04-20 Thread Bruce Fischl
I'll leave the first question for Martin but it looks right to me (except for the typo in what should be "-autorecon3"). For the second one I think you want to rerun the mri_segstats and mris_anatomical_stats commands, which should be done by autorecon3 cheers Bruce On Mon, 20 Apr 2015, pras

[Freesurfer] Edits to longitudinal pial surface and aseg

2015-04-20 Thread prasser
Dear All, I wanted to check that corrections to a Long pial surface through edits to brainmask.mgz and brain.finalsurfs.manedit.mgz are followed by the command: recon-all -long tpN1 templateID -autorecon2-pial -autorecom3 Is this correct? Also, after editing the Long aseg.mgz to correct the vo