Hi,
editing the long does not really introduce much bias I think. It is
usually not necessary and it is not recommended, because often it
problems in the long are caused by earlier problems in the base or even
cross, so it is best to fix it there. Your case seems to be different
(problems fir
Repost.Thanks.
On Mon, 20 Apr 2015 16:21:38 -0700 wrote
Thank you for your reply.
Yes, I'm finding that it is only small edits that are required in the Long for
the case of pial surface errors. It is usually in areas where no editing was
required in the cross and
Thank you for your reply.
Yes, I'm finding that it is only small edits that are required in the Long for
the case of pial surface errors. It is usually in areas where no editing was
required in the cross and base, but the pial surface in the Long extends to
include dura or cerebellum. I was ho
I'll leave the first question for Martin but it looks right to me
(except for the typo in what should be "-autorecon3"). For the second one I
think you want to rerun the mri_segstats and mris_anatomical_stats
commands, which should be done by autorecon3
cheers
Bruce
On Mon, 20 Apr 2015, pras
Dear All,
I wanted to check that corrections to a Long pial surface through edits to
brainmask.mgz and brain.finalsurfs.manedit.mgz are followed by the command:
recon-all -long tpN1 templateID -autorecon2-pial -autorecom3
Is this correct?
Also, after editing the Long aseg.mgz to correct the vo