Yes, that is correct
On 9/30/2020 3:12 PM, Martin Juneja wrote:
External Email - Use Caution
Dear Doug,
*--sumwf * seems to work fine - it gives subjectwise values and values
seems of to be of volume:
11262.26605
9294.07182
12673.14610
12601.33416
11141.31917
External Email - Use Caution
Dear Doug,
*--sumwf * seems to work fine - it gives subjectwise values and values
seems of to be of volume:
11262.26605
9294.07182
12673.14610
12601.33416
11141.31917
Whenever you get a chance, could you please confirm if --sumwf is
External Email - Use Caution
Dear Doug,
Yes, that gives me subjectwise values if I run the following command, but
now the output doesn't seem to be the volume values, it gives very small
subjectwise values as following:
mri_segstats --seg lh.HC_GAD.vol.glmdir/p_bin.mgz
Use the --avgwf output.table instead of --sum
On 9/30/2020 1:48 PM, Martin Juneja wrote:
External Email - Use Caution
Dear Doug,
Thanks for your response. I created a binary mask and ran the
following command, but the output gives me only one value of volume as
follows. I was
External Email - Use Caution
Dear Doug,
Thanks for your response. I created a binary mask and ran the following
command, but the output gives me only one value of volume as follows. I was
wondering how I can extract the values for each subject.
mri_segstats --seg
If you have a binary mask or cluster mask, you can use mri_segstats, like
mri_segstats --seg binary-or-clustermask.mgz --excludeid 0 --i
volumestack.mgz --accumulate --sum volumesum.dat
where volumestack.mgz is a stack of the subjects volume (eg, created by
mris_preproc)
On 9/29/2020 1:32
External Email - Use Caution
Dear Doug and FreeSurfer team,
Any help with this on an urgent basis would be really appreciated. Sorry
for being a little impatient :(.
Thank you so much !
-- Forwarded message -
From: Martin Juneja
Date: Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 5:42
