, 2024 at 9:20 AM
*To: *freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
*Subject: *Re: [Freesurfer] aparc & wm underestimation
This is difficult to debug remotely. The first thing to look at is the
?h.orig surface. Does that look more-or-less right? If not, then it
means that the wm.mgz is wrong. If it
: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
on behalf of Douglas N. Greve
Date: Wednesday, March 6, 2024 at 9:20 AM
To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] aparc & wm underestimation
This is difficult to debug remotely. The first thing to look at is the ?h.orig
surface.
*To: *freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
*Subject: *Re: [Freesurfer] aparc & wm underestimation
Just to make sure I understand, the problem is that the white surface
on the left side of the image is extending too far into subcortical
gray matter, right? This can be difficult to fix, but the right
...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
on behalf of Douglas N. Greve
Date: Tuesday, March 5, 2024 at 9:11 AM
To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] aparc & wm underestimation
Just to make sure I understand, the problem is that the white surface on the
left side of the image is extending too
arch 3, 2024 at 3:38 PM
*To: *freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
*Subject: *Re: [Freesurfer] aparc & wm underestimation
Can you send pictures of the slices showing the problem?
On 3/3/2024 3:18 PM, Stanica, Maria wrote:
*External Email - Use Caution *
Hello FS developers,
Can you send pictures of the slices showing the problem?
On 3/3/2024 3:18 PM, Stanica, Maria wrote:
External Email - Use Caution
Hello FS developers,
I ran my subjects through skullstripping and recon-all. Everything
processed correctly (and exited without errors), except 4 images
External Email - Use Caution
Hello FS developers,
I ran my subjects through skullstripping and recon-all. Everything processed
correctly (and exited without errors), except 4 images which have an
underestimation in coronal subcortical region. The underestimation is
significant
