Re: [Freesurfer] motion dependent resolution: bbr vs flt

2013-07-16 Thread Gerit Pfuhl
: Von: Anastasia Yendiki [ayend...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] Gesendet: Dienstag, 16. Juli 2013 20:51 An: Pfuhl, Gerit Cc: Roschinski, Benjamin; freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu; King, Joseph Betreff: Re: AW: [Freesurfer] motion dependent resolution: bbr vs flt Is the motion

Re: [Freesurfer] motion dependent resolution: bbr vs flt

2013-07-15 Thread Douglas N Greve
Hi Benjamin, BBR does not need higher resolution. Do you mean motion in the anatomical or motion in the DTI? BBR should be pretty robust in either case. It is hard to know what might be going on without more details of why you think it is getting worse. doug On 07/14/2013 08:01 AM,

[Freesurfer] motion dependent resolution: bbr vs flt

2013-07-14 Thread Roschinski, Benjamin
Dear freesurfer experts and users, we visualize white matter tracts of anorexia nervosa patients which are characterized by more movements in mri studies. We have the impression that we get worser TRACULA outputs by using bbregister than flt. Could it be possible that bbregister needs a higher