To comment further on this.
It appears that - at least in our data - the talairach registration fails
frequently (i.e. in more than 60% of the cases) as a result of the larger
field inhomogeneities at high field. A good work-around is to use FLIRT for
doing the registration. So just use FLIRT to
Hi Bruce, it seems to work flawlessly. Thanks!
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Martijn Steenwijk
martijnsteenw...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for your quick reply. It seems that we have some other problems now
with the machine, but 'll let you know whether the new mri_tessellate
works ;-).
glad to hear it
Bruce
On Mon, 9 Sep 2013, Martijn Steenwijk wrote:
Hi Bruce, it seems to work flawlessly. Thanks!
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Martijn Steenwijk martijnsteenw...@gmail.com
wrote:
Thanks for your quick reply. It seems that we have some other problems
now with the
Thanks for your quick reply. It seems that we have some other problems now
with the machine, but 'll let you know whether the new mri_tessellate
works ;-).
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Bruce Fischl fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.eduwrote:
here you go. Let us know if it works
cheers
Bruce
On
Dear all,
I'm trying to process some high res data using the approach Lusebrink
proposed, but I'm getting the following error in mri_tessellate:
mri_tessellate ../mri/filled-pretess255.mgz 255 ../surf/lh.orig.nofix
$Id: mri_tessellate.c,v 1.36 2011/03/02 00:04:25 nicks Exp $
$Id: mrisurf.c,v
