@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] selxavg3-sess, -svres
They are not the same. As you point out they have a correlation of
.98, not 1.0. What you are discovering is the inconvenient truth
that task signal accounts for a very small proportion of variation
They are not the same. As you point out they have a correlation of
.98, not 1.0. What you are discovering is the inconvenient truth that
task signal accounts for a very small proportion of variation. Welcome
to fMRI:). I think the reason why the residual does not equal y - X*beta
is that they
Hi Doug,
In order to understand my data better, I did the following analysis. First, I
did a full model analysis with all stimuli conditions included in the analysis
using: mkanalysis-sess -fsd bold -paradigm xy_mky_category_eye_weights.par
-event-related -refeventdur 1 -no-inorm -delay 0
