if you used the identity matrix then it is the first one
On 02/08/2017 08:43 AM, Seung-Goo KIM wrote:
> Thank you very much, Doug,
>
> One more question: so the sig have all T-test results of contrasts
> like [1 0 0 … 0], [0 1 0 ... 0], …, [0 0 0 … 1], right? or [1 -1/(N-1)
> -1/(N-1), …
Thank you very much, Doug,
One more question: so the sig have all T-test results of contrasts like [1 0 0
… 0], [0 1 0 ... 0], …, [0 0 0 … 1], right? or [1 -1/(N-1) -1/(N-1), …
-1/(N-1)] ?
Best,
--
Seung-Goo KIM
> On 2017-02-06, at 18:54, Douglas N Greve wrote:
>
yes, fsig is the F test. The sig has the result of all the individual
t-tests
On 02/06/2017 08:41 AM, Seung-Goo KIM wrote:
> Dear surfers,
>
> I computed F-contrast using selxavg3-sess with an identity matrix as a
> contrast matrix. My question is about the result file “sig.*”. As far
> as I
Dear surfers,
I computed F-contrast using selxavg3-sess with an identity matrix as a contrast
matrix. My question is about the result file “sig.*”. As far as I understand,
the “sig.*” file contains signed-minnus-log-p-values (like, -log10(p)*Sign(t))
for a certain contrast.
So I expected the