[Freesurfer] how to edit the pial surface

2012-05-19 Thread 李盟
Hi FreeSurfer Experts,

I had 2 question about the output troubleshooting.

 

1) when I used the mri_convert command, the format of the input image I 
choosed was 4D nii format, but not the original dicom format, which would 
affect the result of reconstruction?

2) When I checked the quality of output using tksurfer, I found the color 
line representing the surface (pial and white) were not along the folding 
pattern, and the distance between the two sufaces was rather short. Whether or 
not it was caused by the bad GM/WM contrast? What is the best way to deal with 
them?

 

Thanks.

 

Meng Li
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] how to edit the pial surface

2012-05-19 Thread Bruce Fischl

Hi Meng

1. Not positive  I understand, but I don't think it should matter.

2. we'll need to see some data to diagnose this.

cheers
Bruce


On Sat, 19 May 2012, ?? wrote:



Hi FreeSurfer Experts,

I had 2 question about the output troubleshooting.

 

1) when I used the mri_convert command, the format of the input image I
choosed was 4D nii format, but not the original dicom format, which would
affect the result of reconstruction?

2) When I checked the quality of output using tksurfer, I found the
color line representing the surface (pial and white) were not along the
folding pattern, and the distance between the two sufaces was rather short.
Whether or not it was caused by the bad GM/WM contrast? What is the best way
to deal with them?

 

Thanks.

 

Meng Li




___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] 回复: Re: how to edit the pial surface

2012-05-19 Thread Bruce Fischl
p.s. looks like an intensity normalization failure. Can you give us details 
of the acquisition? Sequence name, voxel resolution, etc? If you upload 
the subject I'll take a look


cheers
Bruce

On Sat, 19 May 2012, 
limengsecret wrote:



Hi Professor,
The image blow shows the problems which occur.
color lines representing the surfaces (pial and white) were not along the
folding pattern, and the distance between the two sufaces was rather short.
How to deal with these problems?
 [IMAGE]
Thanks.
 
Meng Li
 


limengsecret
 
From: Bruce Fischl
Date: 2012-05-19 22:08
To: ??
CC: freesurfer
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] how to edit the pial surface
Hi Meng
 
1. Not positive  I understand, but I don't think it should matter.
 
2. we'll need to see some data to diagnose this.
 
cheers
Bruce
 
 
On Sat, 19 May 2012, ?? wrote:
 
 
 Hi FreeSurfer Experts,
 
 I had 2 question about the output troubleshooting.
 
 ?
 
 1)?? when I used the mri_convert command, the format of the input image I
 choosed was 4D nii format, but not the original dicom format, which would
 affect the result of reconstruction?
 
 2)?? When I checked the quality of output using tksurfer, I found the
 color line representing the surface (pial and white) were not along the
 folding pattern, and the distance between the two sufaces was rather shor
t.
 Whether or not it was caused by the bad GM/WM contrast? What is the best

?? ?way

 to deal with them?
 
 ?
 
 Thanks.
 
 ?
 
 Meng Li
 
 
 
 

 
 
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it i
s
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-ma
il
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLi
ne at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in e
rror
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and pro
perly
dispose of the e-mail.
 

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] ERROR: comparison in expression (FS with SGE)

2012-05-19 Thread Matt Glasser
Rather one unsets it like this:

unset POSIXLY_CORRECT

Peace,

Matt.

-Original Message-
From: Matt Glasser [mailto:m...@ma-tea.com] 
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2012 12:47 PM
To: 'freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu'
Subject: RE: [Freesurfer] ERROR: comparison in expression (FS with SGE)

Another note on this:

Apparently, getopt (used in fsl_sub) doesn't work correctly when this flag
is not set to 1 (it picks op a lot of options it shouldn't).  Thus, instead
of commenting out the flag, it is better to set it to zero after the 

set -- `getopt T:q:a:p:M:j:t:N:n:Fvm:l: $*`

Line.  Then one gets the best of both worlds.  

Peace,

Matt.

-Original Message-
From: Matt Glasser [mailto:m...@ma-tea.com] 
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2012 5:36 PM
To: 'freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu'
Subject: RE: [Freesurfer] ERROR: comparison in expression (FS with SGE)

I'm dredging this 2 year old post up for the benefit of Google and anyone
else who wonders about the cause of this.  It is a non-fatal error (for
FreeSurfer, but perhaps not other things) that is caused by having set the
variable:

POSIXLY_CORRECT=1

It causes bc (on Debian/Ubuntu) systems to fail when making comparisons
like:

echo '3.5  2.5' | bc -l

I am guessing (because this is what I was doing) that the poster was using
fsl_sub to launch FreeSurfer jobs in SGE.  fsl_sub sets this flag for some
reason, but commenting it out seems not to cause any problems.

Peace,

Matt.

-Original Message-
From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
[mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Xue, Feng
Sent: Sunday, March 14, 2010 1:37 PM
To: Bruce Fischl
Cc: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] ERROR: comparison in expression (FS with SGE)

Thanks! I would check them later.

On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 1:24 AM, Bruce Fischl
fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
 if it was a syntax error then recon-all wouldn't have finished, so I'm not
 sure what's going on. You should visually inspect the surfaces and
 segmentations to make sure they are all ok.

 cheers,
 Bruce

 On Mon, 15 Mar 2010, Xue, Feng wrote:

 Sorry, I didn't notice that the reply address was not the list, I've
 done re-post it.

 Is there any method to check whether it is ok? For SGE, it might only
 write errors to dot e files instead of warnings.

 It seemed like a shell syntax error, however, I don't have that
 experience to check the recon-all script.

 On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 11:24 PM, Bruce Fischl
 fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:

 can you post this to the list? There are others better qualified to say
 what's going on. But if everything finished ok is there really a
problem?
 Maybe this is just a warning?
 On Sun, 14 Mar 2010, Xue, Feng wrote:

 Hi Bruce,

 Thanks for your reply. The recon-all.log said it finished without
 error. please find the whole scripts root in the attachment.
 I'm also running a raw testing with one subject and without
SGEMaybe
 I can report the result the day after tomorrow.

 BTW, I found in my 64bit Debian nodes, I repeated got the error as
below
 (standard_in) 2: Error: comparison in expression
 but in 32bit, I met both.

 for the GMail security restriction, I changed recon-all.cmd in the
 attachment to recon-all.cmds.

 On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 11:58 PM, Bruce Fischl
 fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:

 what does the recon-all.log say? Did the recon finish correctly? Does
 this
 happen if you just run it on the command line?
 Bruce

 On Sat, 13 Mar 2010, Xue, Feng wrote:

 Dear Bruce  FS experts,

 Please forgive my re-post, for I havn't got any response from last
 post.
 I do appreciate if anyone could give me a hint or suggestion.

 ++

 We are running freesurfer with Sun GridEngine. Currently, we
 repeatedly got this error in SGE's job error log file on some data
 when doing recon_all:

 $ cat recon_xf.e437
 (standard_in) 2: Error: comparison in expression
 $ cat recon_xf.e431
 (standard_in) 2: comparison in expression

 I also checked the recon-all-status.log file, but not error was
found.

 Has anyone met this problem? Is it critical?
 Thanks in advance.

 --
 Best Regards

 Xue, Feng Phd. candidate
 Major in Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience

 National Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning
 Beijing Normal University
 Beijing, China. 100875
 Tel: +86-13810154455
 web: http://psychbrain.bnu.edu.cn
 ==
 Welcome to MuDuo JinSheng BBS @ Beijing Normal University
 telnet://bbs.mdjs.org
 http://bbs.mdjs.org
 ___
 Freesurfer mailing list
 Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
 https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer





 The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom
 it
 is
 addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the
 e-mail
 contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance
 

[Freesurfer] how to map the anatomical to the diffusion space

2012-05-19 Thread 李盟
Hi FreeSurfer Experts,
Using the mri_surfcluster command, I got the labels of the significant regions 
from qdec comparisons of thickness between two groups.
The diffusion data was not processed using the dt_recon, but DTI-studio. So how 
can I map the significant regions to the individual diffusion space?
 
Thanks a lot.
Meng Li
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


[Freesurfer] How to edit the pial surface

2012-05-19 Thread 李盟
Hi professor,
The attachment is the subject after running the recon-all command. MR data were 
obtained on a 1.5T Philips Achieva Nova Dual MR  scanner. the sequence name is 
T1W.3D.FFE.SENSE and the voxel size is 0.90*0.90*1mm. how should I fix the poor 
quality surface reconstruction?
 
Thanks a lot for your help.
Meng Li


At 2012-05-19 23:10:31,Bruce Fischl fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
p.s. looks like an intensity normalization failure. Can you give us details 
of the acquisition? Sequence name, voxel resolution, etc? If you upload 
the subject I'll take a look

cheers
Bruce

On Sat, 19 May 2012, 
limengsecret wrote:

 Hi Professor,
 The image blow shows the problems which occur.
 color lines representing the surfaces (pial and white) were not along the
 folding pattern, and the distance between the two sufaces was rather short.
 How to deal with these problems?
  [IMAGE]
 Thanks.
  
 Meng Li
  
 
 
 limengsecret
  
 From: Bruce Fischl
 Date: 2012-05-19 22:08
 To: ??
 CC: freesurfer
 Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] how to edit the pial surface
 Hi Meng
  
 1. Not positive  I understand, but I don't think it should matter.
  
 2. we'll need to see some data to diagnose this.
  
 cheers
 Bruce
  
  
 On Sat, 19 May 2012, ?? wrote:
  
  
  Hi FreeSurfer Experts,
  
  I had 2 question about the output troubleshooting.
  
  ?
  
  1)?? when I used the mri_convert command, the format of the input image I
  choosed was 4D nii format, but not the original dicom format, which would
  affect the result of reconstruction?
  
  2)?? When I checked the quality of output using tksurfer, I found the
  color line representing the surface (pial and white) were not along the
  folding pattern, and the distance between the two sufaces was rather shor
 t.
  Whether or not it was caused by the bad GM/WM contrast? What is the best
?? ?way
  to deal with them?
  
  ?
  
  Thanks.
  
  ?
  
  Meng Li
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
 The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it i
 s
 addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-ma
 il
 contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLi
 ne at
 http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in e
 rror
 but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and pro
 perly
 dispose of the e-mail.
  
 



从QQ邮箱发来的超大附件
Sub.rar (262MB, 2012年06月19日 12:40 到期)
进入下载页面:http://mail.qq.com/cgi-bin/ftnExs_download?k=0d636362224297d81b9673551e640018555650550c520a561c5055060a49060409534e5a0f02041a535400500e0051070753545b3863326444014d105916320acode=1ccb8d27t=exs_ftn_download___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.