Hi, Doug,
Ok, as you point out, my conversion of p to t assumed that it was a
1-sided test. Also, I was using real data, where an effect *might* have
been screwing with the outputs. I have fixed both of these problems, but
my initial observation remains unchanged.
Using the synthetic data, the
Hi Jorge,
the fsaverage subject has less surface area than any of the individuals.
We typically correct for this by including the average surface area in
the surfaces created by make_average_subject. For example:
mris_info ~/local_subjects/fsaverage/surf/lh.white
reading group avg surface
Hi Alex,
is that cortex is it accumbens? What do the asegs look like?
Bruce
On Fri, 14 Sep
2007, Alex Fornito wrote:
Hi all,
I've been having problems getting accurate surfaces in the subgenual
cingulate region, as illustrated in the attached pics. I previously posted to
the list about
Hi Rachel,
I don't know of any high resolution standard brain. Barry Kosofsky has been
working on making some pediatric atlases for automated segmentation, you
might check with him.
cheers,
Bruce
On Wed, 12 Sep
2007, Dick, Rachel wrote:
Hello,
I have T1 images at 0.8 x 0.8 x 0.8...Is
Dear all,
I have 2 questions regarding doing analyses using QDEC:
1) can I use QDEC to analyse results on data for which I ran recon-all
using the last (ie: older, not most recent) version of Freesurfer, or
should I rerun recon-all on all the data using the new version of
Freesurfer? (I hope
Narly,
You can use qdec on data processed with the v3.0 processing stream, as
long as you create the 'qcached' files that qdec needs, which is done
using v4.0 recon-all, as you have done.
You can ignore those warning message. They are informative (I will
change it to say INFO). The ?h.volume
Hi,
I have a few questions, the answers to which probably all involve running
mri_surfcluster with the correct arguments specified.
1) What is the easiest way to obtain peak vertex information from a given
cluster?
2) For a given sig.mgh file, is there a command which outputs a list/text
Hi,
I am attempting to work with volume data for the first time and trying
to figure out how to control what temporal offset is shown in the
functional overlay. I checked the options, the wiki, etc, but didn't
find anything yet. That is most like because I'm looking at old data
that was
1) What is the easiest way to obtain peak vertex information from a given cluster?
2) For a given sig.mgh file, is there a command which outputs a list/text file
of all clusters present?
Hi,
The --sum option allows you to provide a name for the textfile it will
generate containing
-centos4_x86_64-stable-v4.0.0-20070914
RedHat release: CentOS release 4.4 (Final)
Kernel info: Linux 2.6.9-42.0.3.ELsmp x86_64
NMR Center info (/space/freesurfer exists):
machine: nexlin6
SUBJECTS_DIR: /space/sake/3/users/inverse/subjects
PWD: /space/nexus/20/users/jandrews/FDN/070814_4TT00316
Use the menu command View-Configure-Functional Overlay... to open the
Configure Functional Overlay dialog box. At the top of this are two
spinboxes to control the time point and condition (if available) for
your functional data. Don't forget to click the Apply button at the
button of the dialog
Hi All,
I'm trying to connect to a computer remotely to use freesurfer. However, when I
log in and try to load up a surface in freesurfer, I get the following message:
-No glx extension!
-Surfer: failed, trying double buffered window
-Xlib: extension GLX missing on display computer name
-Window
:
-
FREESURFER_HOME: /usr/local/freesurfer/stable4
Build stamp: freesurfer-Linux-centos4_x86_64-stable-v4.0.0-20070914
RedHat release: CentOS release 4.4 (Final)
Kernel info: Linux 2.6.9-42.0.3.ELsmp x86_64
NMR Center info (/space/freesurfer exists):
machine: nexlin6
SUBJECTS_DIR: /space/sake
13 matches
Mail list logo
