Hi FreeSurfer Experts,
I had 2 question about the output troubleshooting.
1) when I used the mri_convert command, the format of the input image I
choosed was 4D nii format, but not the original dicom format, which would
affect the result of reconstruction?
2) When I checked the
Hi Meng
1. Not positive I understand, but I don't think it should matter.
2. we'll need to see some data to diagnose this.
cheers
Bruce
On Sat, 19 May 2012, ?? wrote:
Hi FreeSurfer Experts,
I had 2 question about the output troubleshooting.
1) when I used the mri_convert
p.s. looks like an intensity normalization failure. Can you give us details
of the acquisition? Sequence name, voxel resolution, etc? If you upload
the subject I'll take a look
cheers
Bruce
On Sat, 19 May 2012,
limengsecret wrote:
Hi Professor,
The image blow shows the problems which
Rather one unsets it like this:
unset POSIXLY_CORRECT
Peace,
Matt.
-Original Message-
From: Matt Glasser [mailto:m...@ma-tea.com]
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2012 12:47 PM
To: 'freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu'
Subject: RE: [Freesurfer] ERROR: comparison in expression (FS with SGE)
Another
Hi FreeSurfer Experts,
Using the mri_surfcluster command, I got the labels of the significant regions
from qdec comparisons of thickness between two groups.
The diffusion data was not processed using the dt_recon, but DTI-studio. So how
can I map the significant regions to the individual
Hi professor,
The attachment is the subject after running the recon-all command. MR data were
obtained on a 1.5T Philips Achieva Nova Dual MR scanner. the sequence name is
T1W.3D.FFE.SENSE and the voxel size is 0.90*0.90*1mm. how should I fix the poor
quality surface reconstruction?
Thanks a