[Freesurfer] Problem in final analysis

2013-09-28 Thread carina
Dear freesurfer community, we are conducting cortical-thickness analysis using freesurfer-4.4.0 and have been experiencing some problems with the final analysis steps. We are using the qdec. Uploading of the data table has been successful. When we try to use the “Analyze” command (design) in

Re: [Freesurfer] Major problems with T2-based pial removal

2013-09-28 Thread Bruce Fischl
hmmm. That would be strange and would result in complete failure (which I guess is what you have seen). For what it's worth, Matt is right and we haven't tested the code on many datasets, but at least so far it has been independent of contrast (that is, it works on both T2 and FLAIR) cheers

Re: [Freesurfer] Problem in final analysis

2013-09-28 Thread Douglas Greve
Hi Carina, run recon-all -s subject -qcache for each subject and this will create the file doug On 9/28/13 5:37 AM, car...@van-vlodrop.de wrote: Dear freesurfer community, we are conducting cortical-thickness analysis using freesurfer-4.4.0 and have been experiencing some problems with

[Freesurfer] LGI longitudinal data

2013-09-28 Thread Tricia Merkley
Hi, Is it possible to run the LGI on data that has already been longitudinally processed? For example, when I try to run: recon-all -s subject001.long.subject001_base -localGI I get the following error: ERROR: Are you trying to run or re-run a longitudinal time point?    If so, please

Re: [Freesurfer] Major problems with T2-based pial removal

2013-09-28 Thread Michael Waskom
On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 5:28 AM, Bruce Fischl fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.eduwrote: hmmm. That would be strange and would result in complete failure I agree, but $ grep bbregister recon_log_withT2.txt $ grep fslregister recon_log_withT2.txt both turn up empty

Re: [Freesurfer] Major problems with T2-based pial removal

2013-09-28 Thread Bruce Fischl
hmmm, maybe Nick or Doug can investigate, although we are crazy busy at the moment On Sat, 28 Sep 2013, Michael Waskom wrote: On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 5:28 AM, Bruce Fischl fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote: hmmm. That would be strange and would result in complete failure I agree,