Re: [Freesurfer] mri_surf2vol cannot recognize the type of surf/lh.inflated

2017-05-15 Thread Lukas Pezenka
d to see how to run it). Christophe's has sulci > labeled separately so might be better for your purposes. Or you could > create your own from your own label(s) > On Mon, 15 May 2017, Lukas Pezenka > wrote: > >> Hi Bruce, >> >> not sure - from what I see, sulci are

Re: [Freesurfer] mri_surf2vol cannot recognize the type of surf/lh.inflated

2017-05-15 Thread Lukas Pezenka
kas > > lh.sulc is not a surface - it's a scalar field over the surface. Have you > looked at the wmparc? Does it not fill your needs? > > cheers > Bruce > > > On Mon, 15 > May 2017, Lukas Pezenka wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> here's my follow-up: I've now t

Re: [Freesurfer] mri_surf2vol cannot recognize the type of surf/lh.inflated

2017-05-15 Thread Lukas Pezenka
necessary. Can anybody recommend another way (or a solution to either my mri_surf2vol or mris_fill problems) of obtaining a binary sulcus mask? I'm in desperate need of one.. Best regards, Lukas On 12.05.2017 16:18, Lukas Pezenka wrote: > Hi all, > > I need a volume that maps my sulci

[Freesurfer] mri_surf2vol cannot recognize the type of surf/lh.inflated

2017-05-12 Thread Lukas Pezenka
Hi all, I need a volume that maps my sulci. So first I've run recon-all on my data. Worked like a charm. Visual verification in freeview shows that the inflated surface looks just about right (although it does not seem to be registered to the aparc+aseg volume). However, when I try to run