Re: [Freesurfer] cluster threshold

2013-09-09 Thread Yang, Daniel
Hi Doug, That sounds good! Thanks so much! Best, Daniel -- Yung-Jui Daniel Yang, PhD Postdoctoral Researcher Yale Child Study Center New Haven, CT (203) 737-5454 On 9/8/13 10:15 PM, Douglas Greve gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edumailto:gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote: Hi Daniel, there is no

Re: [Freesurfer] cluster threshold

2013-09-08 Thread Douglas Greve
It is not a z-value. It is -log10(p), so -log10(.01) = 2 doug On 9/7/13 9:13 PM, Yang, Daniel wrote: Hi FreeSurfer Experts, On this page (https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/FsTutorial/QdecMultipleComparisons), it says: In particular, thresholds of 1.3, 2, 2.3, 3, 3.3 and 4,

Re: [Freesurfer] cluster threshold

2013-09-08 Thread Yang, Daniel
Hi Doug, Thanks! I didn't realize that the threshold is a negative exponent to a base of 10! Just wondering, is there a webpage that I can read to understand why FreeSurfer chooses this exponent approach instead of z-value? Also are 1.3, 2.3, 3.3, 4.3 two-sided, and 1, 2, 3, 4, one-sided? For

Re: [Freesurfer] cluster threshold

2013-09-08 Thread Douglas Greve
Hi Daniel, there is no difference. Once you select the appropriate threshold, it does not matter whether it is a z-field, p-field, t-field, or -log10(p)-field because it gets binarized. doug On 9/8/13 9:33 PM, Yang, Daniel wrote: Hi Doug, Thanks! I didn't realize that the threshold is a

[Freesurfer] cluster threshold

2013-09-07 Thread Yang, Daniel
Hi FreeSurfer Experts, On this page (https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/FsTutorial/QdecMultipleComparisons), it says: In particular, thresholds of 1.3, 2, 2.3, 3, 3.3 and 4, corresponding to p-values of 0.05, 0.01, 0.005, 0.001, 0.0005 and 0.0001, which are common thresholds. I am