Re: [Freesurfer] using different Freesurfer versions for cross-sectional & longitudinal processing

[Martin Reuter]

Hi, 

I have never tested compatibility with 5.1 and would recommend against it (5.1 
was released almost 9 years ago). You can try it out on one subject and check 
results. There would be no support for this however. 

Best, Martin




> On 17. Dec 2019, at 20:34, Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D.  
> wrote:
> 
> I think it should be ok in principle, though it might fail because the v6 
> long stream expects there to be certain files with certain names, and they 
> might not be there with 5.1.
> 
> On 12/16/2019 2:49 PM, Morgan Botdorf wrote:
>> External Email - Use Caution
>> 
>> Dear Freesurfer Experts,
>> 
>> We have child data that was previously processed cross-sectionally using 
>> version 5.1. We are now interested in looking at the data longitudinally. 
>> Can the longitudinal processing stream in version 6.0 be used on data that 
>> was processed cross-sectionally using 5.1? Or is it better that we reprocess 
>> the data using 6.0. We appreciate any help you can provide!
>> 
>> Thank you,
>>  
>> Morgan Botdorf, M.S.
>> Doctoral Candidate
>> Neurocognitive Development Lab
>> University of Maryland, College Park
>> mbotd...@terpmail.umd.edu 
>> Office: 301.405.5922 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ___
>> Freesurfer mailing list
>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu 
>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer 
>> 
> ___
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

Re: [Freesurfer] using different Freesurfer versions for cross-sectional & longitudinal processing

[Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D.]

I think it should be ok in principle, though it might fail because the v6 long 
stream expects there to be certain files with certain names, and they might not 
be there with 5.1.

On 12/16/2019 2:49 PM, Morgan Botdorf wrote:

External Email - Use Caution

Dear Freesurfer Experts,

We have child data that was previously processed cross-sectionally using 
version 5.1. We are now interested in looking at the data longitudinally. Can 
the longitudinal processing stream in version 6.0 be used on data that was 
processed cross-sectionally using 5.1? Or is it better that we reprocess the 
data using 6.0. We appreciate any help you can provide!

Thank you,


Morgan Botdorf, M.S.

Doctoral Candidate

Neurocognitive Development Lab

University of Maryland, College Park

mbotd...@terpmail.umd.edu

Office: 301.405.5922





___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

[Freesurfer] using different Freesurfer versions for cross-sectional & longitudinal processing

[Morgan Botdorf]

External Email - Use Caution

Dear Freesurfer Experts,

We have child data that was previously processed cross-sectionally using
version 5.1. We are now interested in looking at the data longitudinally.
Can the longitudinal processing stream in version 6.0 be used on data that
was processed cross-sectionally using 5.1? Or is it better that we
reprocess the data using 6.0. We appreciate any help you can provide!

Thank you,


Morgan Botdorf, M.S.

Doctoral Candidate

Neurocognitive Development Lab

University of Maryland, College Park
mbotd...@terpmail.umd.edu

Office: 301.405.5922
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer