Re: mris_surfglm

2002-10-10 Thread Doug Greve
Hi Darren, the ico and average7 are about the same computationally. However, it is more convenient to use average7 it has a surface that you can directly render the results on. With ico, you'd still have to run mri_surf2surf to convert it to another surface. I'm not sure what you're trying to

registration of whole cortical sheet

2002-10-10 Thread Darren Weber
Dear Bruce et al, my query is about how to register cortical surfaces across X subjects, given that we have modified the usual left/right surface separation. Some time ago we discussed how to extract a complete cortical surface, rather than the left/right hemi surfaces. The purpose of this

Re: registration of whole cortical sheet

2002-10-10 Thread Bruce Fischl
Hi Darren, that's pretty much the way I generated the lh and rh templates we use. There's a binary named mris_make_template,which you probably have, that will take a bunch of surface models and construct a template (.tif) from them. You'll have to name the individual surface lh or rh, since

Re: registration of whole cortical sheet

2002-10-10 Thread Darren Weber
Thanks, Bruce. mris_make_template --help stops at 'valid options are:' :-( One of the input parameters is a surface name - I suppose 'orig', 'white', 'pial' etc are valid. I'm not sure what surface to specify; is it 'sphere' or 'inflated' or something else? Cheers, Darren - Original

Re: mris_surfglm

2002-10-10 Thread Darren Weber
Hi Doug et al, from looking at the help on mris_surfglm it appears that vertices in the analyses are not as dense as those from the subject surfaces. I'm guessing that using the ico surface with 7 iterations of refinement (lots of vertices!), you then locate the nearest vertex in each subject