hey all!
ok.. sorry guys i detected a calculation mistake… !!
and the now calculated values seem to be close enough to be correct…
anyway… the brainsegvol - brainsegvolnotvent number is different to adding all
ventricle volumes number like —> 21782 and 20980 …
any idea why ?
which way of
sorry, we don't know anything about this template or ch2better. If you
just want to flip the image left right, you can
mri_convert --left-right-reverse-pix input.nii output.nii
On 09/18/2017 01:42 AM, yskim wrote:
> Dear Freesurfer experts,
> I recently received manually segmentated MR data
Thank you! A quick followup question:
I'm interested in running the new devel version (e.g., segmentHA_T1_long.sh
from
https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/HippocampalSubfieldsAndNucleiOfAmygdala)
on my data which was originally processed using the longitudinal pipeline in
version 5.3.
I don't understand what you don't understand. Isn't the web page clear
enough? Are those 5 steps on the web page?
On 09/18/2017 02:20 AM, std...@virgilio.it wrote:
> Thanks, but I not understand if the follow step that you suggested me
> should be used also for FS-FAST analysis.
>
>
On 09/15/2017 02:13 PM, Martin Juneja wrote:
> Hi experts,
>
> I have three questions. I would really appreciate any help.
>
> (1). I ran following commands to estimate relationships between LGI
> and Behav data:
>
> mris_preproc --fsgd Behav.fsgd --target fsaverage --hemi lh --meas
>
oh, I see now. In fsfast, you would
1. run isxconcat-sess on each time point separately (stacks all subjects
into one file)
2. Compute the difference between the time points, eg,
fscalc tp1.nii.gz sub tp2.nii.gz -o diff.nii.gz
3. Then continue from "Create Second FSGD File" on the wiki.
My apologies for the trivial question. Anyway, the web page reports information
for cortical thickness analysis. I understand it.
No information I found on fs-fast longitudinal analysis.
Thus, when I run fs-fast longitudinal analysis, the steps 1-5 should be
performed? Or they are only for
Dear Douglas,
Thanks a lot for your reply.
Could you please clarify why I have to add 0.3 because I am using a
positive sign? How did
Do you mean if I want to use threshold of 3, then adding 0.3 to this so
threshold of 3.3 should be used ?
If I use --sim-sign abs, do you think then there is no
On 09/18/2017 05:47 PM, Benjamin Luerweg wrote:
>
> *am i right that numbers out of the wmparc file of e.g. the insula
> are just the volumes of the white matter part of e.g. the insula?
> *
*no, insula is a gray matter cortical structure. the insulaWM in the
wmparc file is just WM
am i right that numbers out of the wmparc file of e.g. the insula are just
the volumes of the white matter part of e.g. the insula?
would it be ok to add the volumes of the aparc file as the grey matter
volume.. to get the complete
volume of e.g. the insula?
kind
is that the same for the cingulate gyrus? or is cyng really a white and grey
matter splitted structure?
> Am 18.09.2017 um 23:50 schrieb Douglas N Greve :
>
>
>
> On 09/18/2017 05:47 PM, Benjamin Luerweg wrote:
>>
>> *am i right that numbers out of the wmparc
Yes, same for cingulate. I don't really know what you are referring to
in terms of mixed structures. Maybe some subcortical structures are
thought of in this way
On 09/18/2017 05:52 PM, Benjamin Luerweg wrote:
> is that the same for the cingulate gyrus? or is cyng really a white and grey
>
Yes, no problem! As long as you explain it in any publication that might come
out of these analyses.
Cheers,
/Eugenio
--
Juan Eugenio Iglesias
ERC Senior Research Fellow
Translational Imaging Group
University College London
http://www.jeiglesias.com
http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/
On
On 09/18/2017 05:35 PM, Martin Juneja wrote:
> Dear Douglas,
>
> Thanks a lot for your reply.
> Could you please clarify why I have to add 0.3 because I am using a
> positive sign? How did
> Do you mean if I want to use threshold of 3, then adding 0.3 to this
> so threshold of 3.3 should be
Thank you so much Douglas. That's really helpful.
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 2:41 PM, Douglas N Greve
wrote:
>
>
> On 09/18/2017 05:35 PM, Martin Juneja wrote:
> > Dear Douglas,
> >
> > Thanks a lot for your reply.
> > Could you please clarify why I have to add 0.3
Hi Mamun,
There is a little bug in the script.
I’ll fix the dev version ASAP, but rather than downloading a gigabyte, I’d
suggest that you simply edit quantifyHAsubregions.sh (found in
$FREESURFER_HOME/bin/) and replace these two lines:
Thanks, but I not understand if the follow step that you suggested me should be
used also for FS-FAST analysis.
Specifically, I'm refferring to:
1Sample each individual's surface onto the average surface. 2Compute the
difference between each of the pairs in the average surface space.
Dear FreeSurfer Developers
Is FreeSurfer 6 available on Ubunto? If so, does it work properly?
Thank you!
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this
Dear Fereshte,
yes it is. Just download the .tar.gz file for the linux os from
the FreeSurfer download and install page
(https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/DownloadAndInstall)
and subsequently follow the well written installation guide.
Wrt your second question: jop, it does. However,
Hi Eugenio
It is working.
Thank you very much.
Kind regards
Mamun
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 7:55 AM, Iglesias Gonzalez, Eugenio <
e.igles...@ucl.ac.uk> wrote:
> Hi Mamun,
>
> There is a little bug in the script.
>
> I’ll fix the dev version ASAP, but rather than downloading a gigabyte, I’d
>
20 matches
Mail list logo