Dear FS Wiki
I run my scan in FS without any problem
example:
#@#%# recon-all-run-time-hours 8.342
recon-all -s 877 finished without error
then I do some edits to the aseg in freeview
edits include: relabelling correctly lateral ventricles voxels mostly in the
posterior horn of the lateral
sending this again as I have had no responses
Thanks
From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
on behalf of Lucette Cysique
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2016 12:52:11 PM
To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Cc: Madeleine Nichols (Redirection)
Subject
ique-group
From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
on behalf of Lucette Cysique
Sent: Monday, December 19, 2016 12:37:13 PM
To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Cc: Madeleine Nichols (Redirection)
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] minor edits to aseg lead to exist with errors in
about
6 beta freeview - stopped loading remaining files when
one is missing (Ruopeng Wang)
5. Re: 6.0.0 release (Tobias Granberg)
6. Problem with freeview (Jennifer Szeto)
7. Re: minor edits to aseg lead to exist with errors in about
25% of my scans (Lucette Cysique)
8. Re: minor ed
Hello all
FYI
I have found non-negligeable differences in eTIV for 5.3 versus 6.0 in my
healthy young sample
It is probably due to the cerebellum computation changes (presented in released
notes for 6.0)
Unsurprisingly the supratentorial volumes 5.3 versus 6.0 are very similar
(all was chec
Dear Ruopeng and colleagues,
I am interested in following same tracing protocol for the amygdala as in
"Neuroimage. 2012 April 2; 60(2): 1226–1235: "A reliable protocol for the
manual segmentation of the human amygdala and its subregions using ultra-high
resolution MRI”
I would like as they di
