Dear Freesurfers,
I would like to perform cerebellar parcellation on structural mri with
freesurfer. I asked if this was possible 6 months ago (see message below,
saying that this feature wasn't available for now).
I checked on freesurfer wiki the release notes about Freesurfer version
5.2.0
Dear Freesurfers,
I have a problem using the mri_segstats function. I'm trying to get Intra
cranial volumes (ICV) from images that I have previously segmented. As I
have lots of images, I'm using this script :
foreach filename (*_conv)
mri_segstats --subject $(filename) --etiv-only --sum
Dear Freesurfers,
I have just performed cerebellar segmentation with freesurfer. I checked
the segmentation was correct using freeview :
freeview -v t1_xxx/mri/aseg.mgz:colormap=lut:opacity=0.2
I would like to create a figure for my article. However, I'm not able to
find a way to highlight only
Dear Freesurfers,
I already have some experiment in segmentation : I just used FSL to perform
cerebellar segmentation.
I wanted to know if it's possible to run segmentation on a restricted
structure (i.e cerebellum) instead of performing segmentation on the whole
brain. It ll be easier for me and
result
by the n+1 result
Thanks very much for you help
Sincerely yours,
Charles Laidi
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only
Dear freesurfer,
I'm trying to perform parcellation on the cerebellum. After reading closely
freesurfer wiki and the questions related to this topic on the mailing
list, my understanding is that there is no way to perform fully automted
cerebellar parcellation on structural mri with freesurfer.
Dear freesurfers,
I just finished cerebellar segmentation on almost 100 subjects. I have
read the usual checking procedure that should be performed on
freesurfer website. However I wasn't able to find if there is a
specific checking workflow that can be performed when freesurfer is
used for 100 /
, . +/- .
as100351_conv Left-Cerebellum-White-Matter value 1.209679200 is an
outlier (avg = . +/- .)...
The value that appears to be an outliers doesn't match with the value that
I found in Asegstats for Left-Cerebellum-White-Matter.
Thanks a lot for your help, have a nice weekend.
Charles Laidi
Dear FreeSurfers,
I would like to study the interaction between age and cortical thickness in
patients and controls.
My hypothesis is that there is an interaction and that cortical thickness
is decreasing faster with age in patients than in controls.
I have both Male and Female included in 6
to
> create the design matrix yourself as this is outside of the FSGD
> specification.
>
>
> On 10/05/2016 09:22 AM, charles laidi wrote:
> > Dear FreeSurfers,
> >
> > I would like to study the interaction between age and cortical
> > thickness in patients and
10 matches
Mail list logo