Hi,
We extracted volume measures from 7 ROIs in 2 groups and compared
a) Mean of each ROI volume between group, and compared independently such
as
i) whether mean of ROI 1 in group 1 is equal to mean of ROI1 in group 2
ii)whether mean of ROI 2 in group 1 is equal to mean of ROI2 in group 2
and
t;
> All the best,
>
> Anderson
>
>
> On 2 February 2017 at 12:09, neuroimage analyst <
> neuroimage.anal...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks, Anderson. If there are several other measures such as volume,
>> thickness, FA, can I then put them in a single csv file an
erson M. Winkler" <wink...@fmrib.ox.ac.uk>
wrote:
Hi VM,
Please see below:
On 1 February 2017 at 02:38, neuroimage analyst <
neuroimage.anal...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We extracted volume measures from 7 ROIs in 2 groups and compared
> a) Mean of each ROI
Hi, Freesurfer Users.
I tried searching for this question on the mailing list but couldn't get an
answer. Hence, I am posting this here again.
I ran the freesurfer analysis and got cortical thickness map for my group.
I want to build an adjacency matrix by finding the correlation between the
Hello, freesurfer users.
Reposting the previous question again here. I would appreciate any response.
I tried searching for this question on the mailing list but couldn't get an
answer. Hence, I am posting this here again.
I ran the freesurfer analysis and got cortical thickness map for my
Hi,
I was wondering if there is a way to perform fdr correction using command
line in freesurfer without using matlab as mri_glmfit-sim only does
bonferroni ?
Thanks
Regards
MV
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
nks
Regards
MV
On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 1:11 PM, neuroimage analyst <
neuroimage.anal...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering if there is a way to perform fdr correction using command
> line in freesurfer without using matlab as mri_glmfit-sim only does
> bonferroni ?
&
te
> that if your cluster p-value is much less than .05, then you're probably in
> good shape.
>
> On 10/24/16 9:49 PM, neuroimage analyst wrote:
>
> Hi FreeSurfer experts,
>
> I am currently performing some cortical thickness comparisons in my group
> of subjects and
.harvard.edu
> wrote:
> try this binary
>
> https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/safelinks/greve/mri_fdr
>
>
>
> On 10/07/2016 04:11 PM, neuroimage analyst wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I was wondering if there is a way to perform fdr correction using
>
Hi FreeSurfer experts,
I am currently performing some cortical thickness comparisons in my group
of subjects and using
mri_glmfit-sim --glmdir my_dir --cache 2.3010 --cwpalthresh 0.05 --2spaces
found some clusters that have significantly different cortical thickness
values,
Given Eklund et al
t; positive indicates A>B. The F.mgh is the map of F values which are
> unsigned. The gamma.mgh file will have the contrast values themselves
> including sign. The sig.mgh will be the -log10(p) signed by the sign of
> gamma.mgh at that vertex
>
>
> On 10/12/2016 02:23 PM, neuroimage
Hi,
I extracted thalamic, caudate, and putamen volume (left hemisphere), and
cingulate thickness (right hemisphere) from freesurfer's parcellation. Then
I compare these volumes and thickness across two groups using R and found
significant differences in these measurements. Do I have to correct
Hi,
I am attaching this message again and I wI'll appreciate if somebody could
kindly comment on the approach.
Thanks
Regards
-VM
-- Forwarded message --
From: "neuroimage analyst" <neuroimage.anal...@gmail.com>
Date: Dec 18, 2016 2:22 PM
Subject: Register
Hi, all.
I want to register CBF maps derived using pCASL to freesurfer's surface and
derive CBF values in the same regions where I report my cortical thickness,
and volumes. Hence, I did the following:
1) bbregister --s T1_data --mov asldata_mc_even_brain.nii.gz --reg
mean_asl_to_fs_T1 --bold
Thank you!
Regards
--VM
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Douglas N Greve <gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> wrote:
>
>
> On 12/21/2016 01:02 PM, neuroimage analyst wrote:
> > Hi, Doug.
> >
> > Thank you for your response.
> >
> > _Step 1: _I think what
, Douglas Greve <gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
wrote:
> Sorry for the delay
>
> On 12/21/16 12:15 AM, neuroimage analyst wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am attaching this message again and I wI'll appreciate if somebody could
> kindly comment on the approach.
>
> Thanks
>
>
Hi,
I am just curious whether the mask.mgh file returned in glmdir folder
created from lh.cortex.label?
If so, how can I create my own surface mask from the label file?
(mri_label2vol and mri_vol2surf ?)
Second: How can I compare the subcortical volumes between the 2 groups
using glm tools in
other. Am i right?
thanks
regards
VM
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 11:32 AM, Douglas N Greve <gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> wrote:
>
>
> On 12/22/2016 01:33 PM, neuroimage analyst wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am just curious whether the mask.mgh file returned in glmdir folder
Also, there my be some differences in the definition of the medial
> wall across subjects. This does not change with contrast.
>
>
> On 12/22/2016 02:40 PM, neuroimage analyst wrote:
> > Thanks, Doug for that quick response!
> >
> > Does mask.mgh varies between differe
Hi,
We are currently doing longitudinal FreeSurfer analysis on subjects some of
whom are scanned over a period of 6 years. There were 2 groups. One was the
control group and the other was mTBI group. The hypothesis was the control
group would have a fairly stable cortical and sub-cortical volume
Hello.
We recently installed Centos 7 with cuda 8 and tried to build the
FreeSurfer 6.0 using the wiki instructions but were unsuccessful to do so.
Has anyone successfully built FreeSurfer 6 on Cuda 8 (Centos 7) and willing
to share the binaries with us or share their steps with us? We will
surf/?h.w-g.pct.mgh, which you can average
> over each parcellation. Not sure where you would get the noise term from.
>
> On 4/3/19 5:23 PM, neuroimage analyst wrote:
> >
> > External Email - Use Caution
> >
> > I apologize, Dr. Fischl, that I wasnt clear.
u mean by CNR of a surface?
> On Wed, 3 Apr 2019, neuroimage analyst wrote:
>
> >
> > External Email - Use Caution
> >
> > Hi,
> > We were interested in measuring CNR of each of the 68 surfaces in
> Desikan-Killany atlas and compare
> > between t
External Email - Use Caution
Hi,
We were interested in measuring CNR of each of the 68 surfaces in
Desikan-Killany atlas and compare between the groups to verify if our
results are being biased by CNRs in the group?
I came across mri_cnr and mris_ms_surface_cnr binaries in the
gt; gray/white CNR = 2.196, gray/csf CNR = 0.851
> > rh CNR = 1.523
> > total CNR = 1.540
> >
> >
> > cheers
> > Bruce
> >
> > On Wed, 3 Apr 2019, neuroimage analyst wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> External Email - Use Cauti
External Email - Use Caution
Hi.
We are looking for a postdoc to work with us on multimodal MRI and machine
learning to predict Parkinson's disease dementia.
An ideal candidate should be well versed and understand multi-shell
diffusion MRI analysis and processing and have an
26 matches
Mail list logo