Re: [Freesurfer] Cluster-Defining Threshold of p=0.025

2017-09-14 Thread Douglas N Greve
Andy, please remember to post to the FS list, thanks. As for your question, this is a bug in mri_glmfit-sim that hard codes the allowable thresholds. I've attached a version that should work with 1.6. On 09/14/2017 10:06 AM, Jahn, Andrew wrote: Thanks again; I was able to create new

Re: [Freesurfer] Cluster-Defining Threshold of p=0.025

2017-09-13 Thread Douglas N Greve
.mgh.harvard.edu> > *Sent:* Thursday, September 7, 2017 5:55:30 PM > *To:* freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > *Subject:* Re: [Freesurfer] Cluster-Defining Threshold of p=0.025 > If you want to use that threshold, you will have to create tables for > that threshold using

Re: [Freesurfer] Cluster-Defining Threshold of p=0.025

2017-09-13 Thread Jahn, Andrew
edu> Sent: Thursday, September 7, 2017 5:55:30 PM To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Cluster-Defining Threshold of p=0.025 If you want to use that threshold, you will have to create tables for that threshold using mri_mcsim. See https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvar

Re: [Freesurfer] Cluster-Defining Threshold of p=0.025

2017-09-07 Thread Douglas N Greve
If you want to use that threshold, you will have to create tables for that threshold using mri_mcsim. See https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BuildYourOwnMonteCarlo Alternatively, I have a version of mri_glmfit-sim that will run permutation with non-orthogonal designs.