Thank you so much Douglas. That's really helpful.
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 2:41 PM, Douglas N Greve
wrote:
>
>
> On 09/18/2017 05:35 PM, Martin Juneja wrote:
> > Dear Douglas,
> >
> > Thanks a lot for your reply.
> > Could you please clarify why I have to add 0.3
On 09/18/2017 05:35 PM, Martin Juneja wrote:
> Dear Douglas,
>
> Thanks a lot for your reply.
> Could you please clarify why I have to add 0.3 because I am using a
> positive sign? How did
> Do you mean if I want to use threshold of 3, then adding 0.3 to this
> so threshold of 3.3 should be
Dear Douglas,
Thanks a lot for your reply.
Could you please clarify why I have to add 0.3 because I am using a
positive sign? How did
Do you mean if I want to use threshold of 3, then adding 0.3 to this so
threshold of 3.3 should be used ?
If I use --sim-sign abs, do you think then there is no
On 09/15/2017 02:13 PM, Martin Juneja wrote:
> Hi experts,
>
> I have three questions. I would really appreciate any help.
>
> (1). I ran following commands to estimate relationships between LGI
> and Behav data:
>
> mris_preproc --fsgd Behav.fsgd --target fsaverage --hemi lh --meas
>