Re: [Freesurfer] Saving results in volume space

2017-09-18 Thread Martin Juneja
Thank you so much Douglas. That's really helpful. On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 2:41 PM, Douglas N Greve wrote: > > > On 09/18/2017 05:35 PM, Martin Juneja wrote: > > Dear Douglas, > > > > Thanks a lot for your reply. > > Could you please clarify why I have to add 0.3

Re: [Freesurfer] Saving results in volume space

2017-09-18 Thread Douglas N Greve
On 09/18/2017 05:35 PM, Martin Juneja wrote: > Dear Douglas, > > Thanks a lot for your reply. > Could you please clarify why I have to add 0.3 because I am using a > positive sign? How did > Do you mean if I want to use threshold of 3, then adding 0.3 to this > so threshold of 3.3 should be

Re: [Freesurfer] Saving results in volume space

2017-09-18 Thread Martin Juneja
Dear Douglas, Thanks a lot for your reply. Could you please clarify why I have to add 0.3 because I am using a positive sign? How did Do you mean if I want to use threshold of 3, then adding 0.3 to this so threshold of 3.3 should be used ? If I use --sim-sign abs, do you think then there is no

Re: [Freesurfer] Saving results in volume space

2017-09-18 Thread Douglas N Greve
On 09/15/2017 02:13 PM, Martin Juneja wrote: > Hi experts, > > I have three questions. I would really appreciate any help. > > (1). I ran following commands to estimate relationships between LGI > and Behav data: > > mris_preproc --fsgd Behav.fsgd --target fsaverage --hemi lh --meas >