What I would guess is the the STUN lookup failed. Do you have anything on
this box that would prevent FS from doing DNS lookup?
jmesquita
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 3:20 AM, Nandy Dagondon wrote:
> the default setting is "auto-nat".
>
> i changed ext-sip-ip=$${external_sip_ip} and
> ext-rtp-ip=$${
the default setting is "auto-nat".
i changed ext-sip-ip=$${external_sip_ip} and ext-rtp-ip=$${external_rtp_ip}.
both of them are set in vars.xml as stun:stun.freeswitch.org. result: same
problem
i tried your suggestion. still the same problem.
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 1:45 PM, Jason White wrote
Nandy Dagondon wrote:
> hi,
>
> i tested the latest SVN build (13884) using the sample configuration files
> ... no modifications whatsoever. but in sofia external profile, the IP
> address is my internal address instead of my external IP address.
>
> did i miss something here?
Try setting ext
I have Fortune 1000 clients myself, and frankly speaking in real world
they don't even care what type of license the free stuff has. Why?
Simple. Because 90% of the time these companies buy commercial support
and being a commercial customer it's very easy for them to get a
commercial version
of
hi,
i tested the latest SVN build (13884) using the sample configuration files
... no modifications whatsoever. but in sofia external profile, the IP
address is my internal address instead of my external IP address.
did i miss something here? tks.
-nandy
_
hi dave,
tks for sharing us this info. i don't think we can reach 10k prefixes but
your deployment to use external database or mod_lcr is the way to go. re
hardware, i think core2 platform would be enough cuz it will be in a rural
installation. i'm sure it wont reach 200 simultaneous calls.
FS co
Hi Nandy.
On Sun, 2009-06-21 at 08:58 +0800, Nandy Dagondon wrote:
> i'm interested to know if anyone employed FS as a local exchange
> switch. i'm confident FS can handle several calls using RTP by-pass
> mode. however, i'm more concerned on handling the large dialplan with
> hundreds (or even a
Hi,
Saeed thanks for reply my mails.
I am only using ONE FS. The Endpoint 1 call to the FS, then it call to
SWITCH and the SWITCH call back to the FS and this call to Endpoint
2, my first intention were to use FS in bypass_mode, in this mode Fs
only handle SIP signalization and SWITCH (an
David Sugar wrote:
> There are no legal uncertainties with respect to patents in GPL v3. You
> cannot assert them in code you license under it. There was ambiguities
> in GPL v2 in this respect which some companies liked. I prefer to deal
> with honest companies rather than those that are anti-s
Isn't Telco Bridges using it as a switch?
-MC
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 7:58 PM, Nandy Dagondon wrote:
> hi everybody,
>
> i'm interested to know if anyone employed FS as a local exchange switch.
> i'm confident FS can handle several calls using RTP by-pass mode. however,
> i'm more concerned on
There are no legal uncertainties with respect to patents in GPL v3. You
cannot assert them in code you license under it. There was ambiguities
in GPL v2 in this respect which some companies liked. I prefer to deal
with honest companies rather than those that are anti-social or might
choose legal
Hi!
I have a problem with voicemail in that freeswitch fails to let users
leave their message. Something wrong in the config I guess. I see
this in the logs:
2009-06-21 11:28:32.202912 [DEBUG] switch_ivr_play_say.c:118 No
language specified - Using [en]
2009-06-21 11:28:32.238744 [DEBUG] switch
paul.degt wrote:
> Yes, that's one of the reasons. Another point is that GPL v.3 is defined
> more clearly from legal perspective, at least from our legal adviser
> point of view.
>
While the legal status of MPL is widely considered to be vague, is GPL 3
any better? GPL 2 is pretty sound, and
hi everybody,
i'm interested to know if anyone employed FS as a local exchange switch. i'm
confident FS can handle several calls using RTP by-pass mode. however, i'm
more concerned on handling the large dialplan with hundreds (or even a few
thousand) exchange prefixes nationwide during call setup.
We don't need to argue licenses the topic is way too subjective. To each his
own. Let's concentrate on the code and the cool features we can make in the
future.
On Jun 20, 2009 4:00 PM, "Raffaele P. Guidi"
wrote:
Right, fair and easy to deal with. And also to NOT deal with - as would any
develop
Right, fair and easy to deal with. And also to NOT deal with - as would any
developer working in a commercial company. Again, I would consider any
possible choice before using it.
Regards,
Raffaele
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 22:15, paul.degt wrote:
> That's rather bold statement and indicates l
That's rather bold statement and indicates lack of knowledge on the
subject . I would advise you to look at
http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/gpl-faq.html on GPL information.
In fact proprietary applications can use/modify GPL software with no
limitations or obligations towards authors. The
Hello friends.
i'm kind of stucked with mod_fsv and mod_h26x... there is no info on wiki
yet.
have u used them?
Can u send examples of how-to?
I need to join 2 endpoints with full HD video conference using PZT HD
VideoCams to PC and SIP-UA.
Thank you!
EDWIN
ChiPoLy
Cool, thanks, you guys are fast like the light ;)
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 3:44 PM, Darren Schreiber wrote:
> Yes
>
> --
> *From:* Diego Viola [mailto:diego.vi...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Saturday, June 20, 2009 12:41 PM
> *To:* freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
> *S
Yes
_
From: Diego Viola [mailto:diego.vi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, June 20, 2009 12:41 PM
To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] If you use mod_nibblebill,please upgrade to
rev 13866
Is this issue fixed in latest trunk?
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 3
Is this issue fixed in latest trunk?
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 3:32 PM, Darren Schreiber wrote:
> Hello folks,
> An important stability issue was identified in the FreeSWITCH core
> ODBC drivers when utilizing decimal / float columns in databases (at least
> MySQL anyway). This has an adverse
Well, GPL for a library is a dead end. Nobody will use it unless for open
source projects. I would consider any possible choice before using it.
Regards,
Raffaele
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 18:12, paul.degt wrote:
> As I mentioned the decision was influenced by our legal adviser. And it
> probab
Hello folks,
An important stability issue was identified in the FreeSWITCH core ODBC
drivers when utilizing decimal / float columns in databases (at least MySQL
anyway). This has an adverse effect on users of mod_nibblebill, as you are
likely using floating point or decimal columns to track cas
License is less important in a socket interface lib.
Its not really a big deal what license it is guys.
However, I did create a BSD ESL lib distributed with FS to make sure nobody
would have any license problems connecting to our stuff.
If you don't like this lib consider using swig on the wrapper
Not unless you combining GPL and MPL code in one binary, which I find
highly improbable in case of FreeSwitch.
And even in this case there seems to be a workaround:
"However, MPL 1.1 has a provision (section 13) that allows a program (or
parts of it) to offer a choice of another license as well.
There actually are issues between the GPL and MPL :P
/b
On Jun 20, 2009, at 11:12 AM, paul.degt wrote:
> source software there should be absolutely no difference between GPL
> and
> MPL.
___
Freeswitch-users mailing list
Freeswitch-users@lists.free
As I mentioned the decision was influenced by our legal adviser. And it
probably can be relicensed as MPL/GPL, but why?
My understanding is that for an end user which wants to use a free open
source software there should be absolutely no difference between GPL and
MPL.
But if any one has has any
I still say why not MPL or at the very least MPL/GPL?
/b
On Jun 20, 2009, at 9:37 AM, paul.degt wrote:
> Yes, that's one of the reasons. Another point is that GPL v.3 is
> defined
> more clearly from legal perspective, at least from our legal adviser
> point of view.
>
> Diego Viola wrote:
>>
Hi,
I am not expert, and if i understood you correctly, i am doing it like that:
set late negotiation to false (it can be set true if you want to negotiate
it on the fly, but it didn't work for me)
don't use absolute_codec_string instead use codec_string and put codec(s)
what EP2 is offering, no
Yes, that's one of the reasons. Another point is that GPL v.3 is defined
more clearly from legal perspective, at least from our legal adviser
point of view.
Diego Viola wrote:
> Because they probably want a stronger copyleft license?
>
> I prefer the GPL because of that reason.
>
> On Sat, Jun 2
Because they probably want a stronger copyleft license?
I prefer the GPL because of that reason.
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 8:40 AM, Raffaele P. Guidi <
raffaele.p.gu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> uhm... nice! But why not MPL license (the same as freeswitch)?
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 04:06, paul.d...
uhm... nice! But why not MPL license (the same as freeswitch)?
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 04:06, paul.d...@gmail.com wrote:
> http://versafon.com/versafonweb/Software.jsp
>
> Essentially it's a wrapper around inbound socket interface, not all
> events supported yet, and not all event parameters/vari
32 matches
Mail list logo
