Re: [Freeswitch-users] Does FS support STUN by default?

2009-12-11 Thread Fred-145
Michael Jerris wrote: we also support natpmp and static ip setting. What is static ip setting? Telling FS what the public IP is? If that's what it is, what about the UDP ports that must be open to allow incoming connections? So, in the case where the FS server is located in a private network,

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Does FS support STUN by default?

2009-12-11 Thread Russell Mosemann
Fred-145 wrote: What is static ip setting? Telling FS what the public IP is? If that's what it is, what about the UDP ports that must be open to allow incoming connections? Yes, static IP setting puts the (non-changing) IP addresses in the FS configuration. The ports must be manually

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Does FS support STUN by default?

2009-12-11 Thread Fred-145
One last question: Does someone know of a utility for Windows that can check that a NAT router supports either UPnP or NAT-PMP? I guess it's no big deal to write a small diagnostic by connecting to free firewall checkers to see if the relevant ports are open, but if it's already available...

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Does FS support STUN by default?

2009-12-11 Thread Brian West
FreeSWITCH on windows will already poke holes in the windows firewall using upnp. Just start FS and it works. Your outer nat is a larger issue... /b On Dec 11, 2009, at 12:09 PM, Fred-145 wrote: One last question: Does someone know of a utility for Windows that can check that a NAT

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Does FS support STUN by default?

2009-12-11 Thread Brian West
You don't have to do that usually... /b On Dec 11, 2009, at 5:38 PM, Fred-145 wrote: I'll see if I can find a utility that checks that the ports are open after FS is up and running. ___ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list

[Freeswitch-users] Does FS support STUN by default?

2009-12-10 Thread Fred-145
Hello I wanted to check if my ADSL modem worked with STUN, so I left its UPNP activity option unchecked, ran FreeSwitch, and used eg. Shields Up (www.grc.com) to check if UDP5080 (and possibly UDP5060) were opened... which SU says no. Does it mean that... - by default, FS doesn't use STUN - or

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Does FS support STUN by default?

2009-12-10 Thread Rupa Schomaker
STUN is not a way to open ports in a manner in which sheilds up would detect. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/STUN http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/STUNUPNP is what you want if you want to open ports. STUN is just a method for figuring out how to do nat traversal. STUN method is initiated by the

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Does FS support STUN by default?

2009-12-10 Thread Fred-145
Thanks for the clarification. So it's either UPnP or STUN/port-mapping. -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Does-FS-support-STUN-by-default--tp26727762p26731188.html Sent from the Freeswitch-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Does FS support STUN by default?

2009-12-10 Thread Michael Jerris
we also support natpmp and static ip setting. Mike On Dec 10, 2009, at 12:21 PM, Fred-145 wrote: Thanks for the clarification. So it's either UPnP or STUN/port-mapping. ___ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org