On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 5:42 AM, DJB djbin...@yahoo.com wrote:
One thing that I forgot to mention, these 2 FreeSWITCH servers are getting
calls with load balancing from another switch. Thus, the traffic type are
pretty much identical and both FSs have exactly the same on configuration.
Any
Load sharing feature is coming off our Lucent Telica switch.
From: Tim Uckun timuc...@gmail.com
To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
Sent: Wed, December 9, 2009 2:26:41 AM
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Question regarding running FreeSWITCH with high
.
From: DJB djbin...@yahoo.com
To: FREESWITCH-USERS MAILING LIST freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
Sent: Sun, December 6, 2009 5:17:14 PM
Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Question regarding running FreeSWITCH with high
priority enabled.
I have 2 identical Dell PowerEdge 1950 servers
@lists.freeswitch.org
*Sent:* Sun, December 6, 2009 5:17:14 PM
*Subject:* [Freeswitch-users] Question regarding running FreeSWITCH with
high priority enabled.
I have 2 identical Dell PowerEdge 1950 servers running FreeSWITCH Version
1.0.4 (exported) with only one thing difference which is the first one
Minessale anthony.miness...@gmail.com
To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
Sent: Mon, December 7, 2009 8:56:14 AM
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Question regarding running FreeSWITCH with high
priority enabled.
One of the properties of -hp is to enable memlockall() which means disable
*To:* FREESWITCH-USERS MAILING LIST
freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
*Sent:* Sun, December 6, 2009 5:17:14 PM
*Subject:* [Freeswitch-users] Question regarding running FreeSWITCH with
high priority enabled.
I have 2 identical Dell PowerEdge 1950 servers running FreeSWITCH Version
1.0.4 (exported
I have 2 identical Dell PowerEdge 1950 servers running FreeSWITCH Version 1.0.4
(exported) with only one thing difference which is the first one is running
with -hp enabled; however, I have noticed that the one with -hp option consumed
double in memory usage than the other one.
I wonder
